Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emission of volatile organic compounds during open fire cooking with wood biomass: traditional three-stone open fire vs. gasifier cooking stove in rural Kenya
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0090-809X
Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Clinical Medicine, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2185-7885
Centre for International Forestry Research-World Agroforestry (CIFOR-ICRAF), Nairobi, Kenya; Wangari Maathai Institute for Peace and Environmental Studies, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3208-8815
2024 (English)In: Science of the Total Environment, ISSN 0048-9697, E-ISSN 1879-1026, Vol. 934, article id 173183Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Cooking with wood biomass fuels releases hazardous air pollutants, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs), that often disproportionally affect women and children. This study, conducted in Kwale and Siaya counties in Kenya, employed thermal desorption gas chromatography – mass spectrometry to analyse VOC emissions from cooking with a wood biomass three-stone open fire vs. top-lit updraft gasifier stove. In kitchens with adequate ventilation, total VOC levels increased from 35–252 μg∙m−3 before cooking to 2235–5371 μg∙m−3 during open fire cooking, whereas use of a gasifier stove resulted in reduced emissions from cooking by 48–77 % (506–2778 μg∙m−3). However, in kitchens with poor ventilation, there was only a moderate difference in total VOC levels between the two methods of cooking (9034–9378 μg∙m−3 vs. 6727–8201 μg∙m−3 for the three-stone open fire vs. gasifier stove, respectively). Using a non-target screening approach revealed significantly increased levels of VOCs, particularly benzenoids, oxygenated and heterocyclic compounds, when cooking with the traditional open fire, especially in closed kitchens, highlighting the effects of poor ventilation. Key hazardous VOCs included benzene, naphthalene, phenols and furans, suggesting potential health risks from cooking. In kitchens with good ventilation, use of the gasifier stove markedly reduced emissions of these priority toxic VOCs compared to cooking with an open fire. Thus, substituting open fires with gasifier stoves could help to improve household air quality and alleviate health risks. The study revealed that VOCs were present prior to cooking, possibly originating from previously cooked food (buildup) or the outside environment. VOC emissions were also exacerbated by reduced air flow in high humidity during rainfall, suggesting an area for further research. The findings underscore the importance of adopting cleaner cooking technologies and enhancing kitchen ventilation to mitigate the impacts of VOCs in developing countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 934, article id 173183
Keywords [en]
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs), Household air pollution, Non-target screening, Thermal desorption gas chromatography – mass spectrometry (TD GC–MS), Firewood combustion, Sustainable cooking solutions
National Category
Analytical Chemistry Environmental Sciences
Research subject
environmental science; Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-224666DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173183ISI: 001298388100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85193500570OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-224666DiVA, id: diva2:1859671
Part of project
Biochars modified with Moringa oleifera proteins for water treatment, Swedish Research Council Formas
Funder
Swedish Research Council Formas, 2019-00458Available from: 2024-05-22 Created: 2024-05-22 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2222 kB)217 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2222 kBChecksum SHA-512
b10bd8ed45eea9cc511a7e87e87d9545d244f3cd0b81cd48fb8f07c492c0a504b51b81ec6233de3d59ec633f8bee9dcaaba4abe00532bf45ec37b9aa214b764b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Rebryk, Andriy

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rebryk, AndriyKozyatnyk, IvanNjenga, Mary
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
Science of the Total Environment
Analytical ChemistryEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 218 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 341 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf