Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Autoencoder-based anomaly detection in time series: Application to active medical devices
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics.
2024 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The aim of this thesis is to derive an unsupervised method for detecting anomalies in time series. Autoencoder-based approaches are widely used for the task of detecting anomalies where a model learns to reconstruct the pattern of the given data. The main idea is that the model will be good at reconstructing data that does not contain anomalous behavior. If the model fails to reconstruct an observation it will be marked as anomalous.

In this thesis, the derived method is applied to data from active medical devices manufactured by B. Braun. The given data consist of 6,000 length-varying time series, where the average length is greater than 14,000. Hence, the given sample size is small compared to their lengths. Subsequences of the same pattern where anomalies are expected to appear can be extracted from the time series taking expert knowledge about the data into account. Considering the subsequences for the model training, the problem can betranslated into a problem with a large dataset of short time series.

It is shown that a common autoencoder is able to reconstruct anomalies well and is therefore not useful to solve the task. It is demonstrated that a variational autoencoder works better as there are large differences between the given anomalous observations and their reconstructions. Furthermore, several thresholds for these differences are compared. The relative number of detected anomalies in the two given datasets are 3.12% and 5.03%.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 41
Keywords [en]
Variational Autoencoder, Anomaly Detection, Time Series, Neural Networks, Active Medical Devices
National Category
Mathematics Probability Theory and Statistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-225103OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-225103DiVA, id: diva2:1861331
External cooperation
B. Braun
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2024-06-03 Created: 2024-05-28 Last updated: 2024-06-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3533 kB)462 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3533 kBChecksum SHA-512
1f4a7564844be5a9c7ec3959dd973461d350f3292c6ae6956eab375158e55750b5adebb8f8efdc9fe7c88943dfcc32f403e7600876c845d54e575c4828ea55ce
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
MathematicsProbability Theory and Statistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 462 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 324 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf