Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality assessment of radiotherapy in the prospective randomized SENOMAC trial
Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology at, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Radiotherapy and Oncology, ISSN 0167-8140, E-ISSN 1879-0887, Vol. 197, article id 110372Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and purpose: Recommendations for regional radiotherapy (RT) of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer are debated. We here report a RT quality assessment of the SENOMAC trial.

Materials and Methods: The SENOMAC trial randomized clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1–2 SLN macrometastases to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or SLN biopsy only between 2015–2021. Adjuvant RT followed national guidelines. RT plans for patients included in Sweden and Denmark until June 2019 were collected (N = 1176) and compared to case report forms (CRF). Dose to level I (N = 270) and the humeral head (N = 321) was analyzed in detail.

Results: CRF-data and RT plans agreed in 99.3 % (breast/chest wall) and in 96.6 % of patients (regional RT). Congruence for whether level I was an intended RT target was lower (78 %). In accordance with Danish national guidelines, level I was more often an intended target in the SLN biopsy only arm (N = 334/611, 55 %,) than in the cALND arm (N = 174/565, 31 %,). When an intended target, level I received prescribed dose to 100 % (IQR 98–100 %) of the volume. However, even when not an intended target, full dose was delivered to > 80 % of level I (IQR 75–90 %). The intentional inclusion of level I in the target volume more than doubled the dose received by ≥ 50 % of the humeral head.

Conclusion: Congruence between CRF data and RT plans was excellent. Level I received a high dose coverage even when not intentionally included in the target. Including level I in target significantly increased dose to the humeral head.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. Vol. 197, article id 110372
Keywords [en]
(omission of) sentinel lymph node biopsy, Axillary treatment, Breast cancer, Incidental radiotherapy dose, Radiotherapy quality assurance, Radiotherapy techniques, Treatment planning
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-226945DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110372ISI: 001257704000001PubMedID: 38866204Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85195674426OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-226945DiVA, id: diva2:1876730
Available from: 2024-06-25 Created: 2024-06-25 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(890 kB)58 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 890 kBChecksum SHA-512
6a78c97b83722152a88b48463a1b224190db84d5cd4541f9c749baf88541a6e8f8c5cc13b8a0c99bae8c16bd649db355b31079c6e222ff70d78b70821febc1b0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sund, Malin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sund, Malin
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionSurgery
In the same journal
Radiotherapy and Oncology
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical ImagingCancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 58 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 358 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf