Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Long-term association between patient-reported outcomes and psychological factors in patients with a distal radius fracture
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8727-9555
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
2024 (English)In: Journal of Hand Surgery Global Online, E-ISSN 2589-5141, Vol. 6, no 5, p. 650-653Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The outcome after a distal radius fracture (DRF) is often evaluated with radiography, clinical examination, and patient-reported outcome measures. However, research has identified associations between psychological factors and outcomes after a DRF. A knowledge gap exists about psychological factors and their potential implications for long-term outcomes after a DRF. The aim of this study was to examine the long-term association between psychological factors and patient-reported outcomes.

Methods: This multicenter investigation included patients aged 15–75 years with closed physes presenting with an acute DRF. Patients who completed a long-term follow-up (after 11–13 years) with patient-reported outcome measures were invited to participate in the study, and surveys measuring psychological factors were sent to the patients.

Results: Two hundred and four patients (70%) completed the follow-up (mean [range] age at injury, 56 [18–75] years; 154 were females [75%]). Multivariable analysis showed that higher age, injury to the dominant hand, and greater pain catastrophizing were associated with an increase in scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.

Conclusions: A decade after sustaining a DRF, patients with higher scores on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale reported inferior outcomes as measured by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale accounts for 13% of the observed variance in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic level IIb.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 6, no 5, p. 650-653
Keywords [en]
Distal radius fracture, Long-term results, Outcomes, PROM, Psychological factors
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-227841DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.06.004Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85197238971OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-227841DiVA, id: diva2:1883639
Available from: 2024-07-11 Created: 2024-07-11 Last updated: 2024-10-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(312 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 312 kBChecksum SHA-512
be8848d466a5914f973077113d31779f4fc3aba837d890330f18ebed1380b6ae499fe7a28267ae003f8cba07ce4ed546208e7dbcc8f4bf61796fec2bab4bbc65
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Schmidt, ViktorWadsten, Mats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schmidt, ViktorWadsten, Mats
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 87 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 318 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf