Abbreviated versus standard dual antiplatelet therapy times after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with high bleeding risk with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the SWEDEHEART registryShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, E-ISSN 2047-9980, Vol. 13, no 13, article id e034709
Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) reduces ischemic events but increases bleeding risk, especially in patients with high bleeding risk (HBR). This study aimed to compare outcomes of abbreviated versus standard DAPT strategies in patients with HBR with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Methods and results: Patients from the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Bare in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies) registry with at least 1 HBR criterion who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome were identified and included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their planned DAPT time at discharge: 12-month DAPT or an abbreviated DAPT strategy and matched according to their prescribed P2Y12 inhibitor at discharge. The primary outcome assessed was time to net adverse clinical events at 1 year, which encompassed cardiac death, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or clinically significant bleeding. Time to major adverse cardiovascular events and the individual components of net adverse clinical events were considered secondary end points. A total of 4583 patients were included in each group. The most frequently met HBR criteria was age older than 75 years (65.6%) and Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent Dual Antiplatelet Therapy score ≥25 (44.6%) in the standard DAPT group and oral anticoagulant therapy (79.6%) and age 75 years and older (55.2%) in the abbreviated DAPT group. There was no statistically significant difference in net adverse clinical events (12.9% versus 13.1%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.99 [95% CI, 0.88-1.11], P=0.83), major adverse cardiovascular events (8.6% versus 7.9%; HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.94-1.25]), or their components between groups. The results were consistent among all of the investigated subgroups.
Conclusions: In patients with HBR undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention due to acute coronary syndrome, abbreviated DAPT was associated with comparable rates of net adverse clinical events and major adverse cardiovascular events to a DAPT duration of 12 months.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The American Heart Association , 2024. Vol. 13, no 13, article id e034709
Keywords [en]
acute coronary syndrome, dual antiplatelet therapy, high bleeding risk, percutaneous coronary intervention, SWEDEHEART
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-227917DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034709ISI: 001260824200018PubMedID: 38934886Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85198040612OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-227917DiVA, id: diva2:1884977
Funder
Swedish Heart Lung FoundationSwedish Research CouncilThe Crafoord FoundationSwedish Society of Medicine2024-07-192024-07-192025-02-10Bibliographically approved