Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
No general support for functional diversity enhancing resilience across terrestrial plant communities
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina; Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Institute of Biology/Geobotany and Botanical Garden, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (IMBIV), CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina; FCEFyN, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.
BIOME Lab, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Praha, Czech Republic.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Global Ecology and Biogeography, ISSN 1466-822X, E-ISSN 1466-8238, Vol. 33, no 10, article id e13895Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Aim: Understanding the mechanisms promoting resilience in plant communities is crucial in times of increasing disturbance and global environmental change. Here, we present the first meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between functional diversity and resilience of plant communities. Specifically, we tested whether the resilience of plant communities is positively correlated with interspecific trait variation (following the niche complementarity hypothesis) and the dominance of acquisitive and small-size species (following the mass ratio hypothesis), and for the context-dependent effects of ecological and methodological differences across studies.

Location: Global.

Time Period: 2004–2021.

Major Taxa Studied: Vascular plants.

Methods: We compiled a dataset of 69 independent sites from 26 studies that have quantified resilience. For each site, we calculated functional diversity indices based on the floristic composition and functional traits of the plant community (obtained from the TRY database) which we correlated with resilience of biomass and floristic composition. After transforming correlation coefficients to Fisher's Z-scores, we conducted a hierarchical meta-analysis, using a multilevel random-effects model that accounted for the non-independence of multiple effect sizes and the effects of ecological and methodological moderators. Results: In general, we found no positive functional diversity–resilience relationships of grand mean effect sizes. In contrast to our expectations, we encountered a negative relationship between resilience and trait variety, especially in woody ecosystems, whereas there was a positive relationship between resilience and the dominance of acquisitive species in herbaceous ecosystems. Finally, the functional diversity–resilience relationships were strongly affected by both ecological (biome and disturbance properties) and methodological (temporal scale, study design and resilience metric) characteristics. Main Conclusions: We rejected our hypothesis of a general positive functional diversity–resilience relationship. In addition to strong context dependency, we propose that idiosyncratic effects of single resident species present in the communities before the disturbances and biological legacies could play major roles in the resilience of terrestrial plant communities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024. Vol. 33, no 10, article id e13895
Keywords [en]
disturbance, functional diversity, mass ratio hypothesis, meta-analysis, niche complementarity hypothesis, resilience, terrestrial plant communities
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-228414DOI: 10.1111/geb.13895ISI: 001282323900001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85200206490OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-228414DiVA, id: diva2:1889699
Available from: 2024-08-16 Created: 2024-08-16 Last updated: 2024-10-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3413 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 3413 kBChecksum SHA-512
b9930a69e7730e16904ebfdaa9fdbed6dccabe809e5471a8f6dcfdd73214d998cb9edd80f27be13020e5a2bd2897ce39dfdf7f49001ec911b5722bf3a67d9ebc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Wardle, David A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wardle, David A.
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 48 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 222 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf