Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prioritizations in Swedish cataract surgery - when resources are limited: exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6652-7436
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1292-1945
2024 (English)In: Acta Ophthalmologica, ISSN 1755-375X, E-ISSN 1755-3768Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To study the prioritization effects of the of COVID-19 pandemic on Swedish cataract surgery using a national healthcare registry with high coverage.

Setting: A study from the Swedish National Cataract Register (NCR), involving all patients undergoing cataract surgery in Sweden during 2019–2022 – before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Results: With the pandemic outbreak, the number of cataract surgeries fell by 22% in 2020 (15 369 procedures), albeit with large regional differences (−43% to +58%). The numbers recovered in 2021, and in 2022, a new top notation was seen (n = 149 952). On a national level, the patients were younger (−0.46 years, p < 0.001), with a larger proportion of less difficult cases (p < 0.001) and the proportion of males was higher (p < 0.001) during the pandemic, but all these variables also differed substantially between different regions and clinics.

Conclusion: A national registry with high coverage can map the consequences of an event disrupting elective surgery in detail. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact on Swedish cataract surgery varied largely between different regions, clinics, and healthcare providers, leading to inequality in the availability of surgery. These differences likely owed to variations in healthcare policy approaches in different parts of the country. The present study shows that outcomes at one clinic or region cannot be extrapolated to larger regions under these circumstances. It actualizes the need to aim for a healthcare on equal terms, but it also shows a system that delivers care to many despite difficult times.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2024.
Keywords [en]
age, cataract, COVID-19, gender, ocular comorbidity, patient selection, phacoemulsification, visual acuity
National Category
Ophthalmology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-228588DOI: 10.1111/aos.16749ISI: 001288985700001PubMedID: 39129645Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85201046197OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-228588DiVA, id: diva2:1890274
Available from: 2024-08-19 Created: 2024-08-19 Last updated: 2024-08-19

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(385 kB)137 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 385 kBChecksum SHA-512
f3a2b8128d3e6a44ae3457226515986b3a6131ff48673bb3e3ffc8b55aaa56f096565b1440e7e69bb12e8ec928f1c9994083099783e49154af3eae3aebcddac4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Kreku, RubenBehndig, AndersViberg, Andreas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kreku, RubenBehndig, AndersViberg, Andreas
By organisation
Ophthalmology
In the same journal
Acta Ophthalmologica
Ophthalmology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 143 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 178 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf