Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Regeringar och polariserade parlament: En uppsats om hur två former av polarisering påverkar regeringars stabilitet.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2024 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Governments and polarized parliaments: : A paper on how two forms of polarization influence the governmental stability (English)
Abstract [en]

Both the topics of government stability and political polarization have a long tradition in political science. This paper's goal was to examine if there is a causal relationship between polarization and government stability in Europe. Prior research has presented arguments for both positive and negative effects of polarization on government stability. Here, the distinction between polarization as divergence and polarization as extremity is used to clarify some of the issues in this research. Government stability is operationalized in terms of the number of days a government is in power. Polarization as divergence is operationalized using Dalton's polarization index, while polarization as extremity is measured by the size of outer-edge parties. A multiple regression analysis is used to determine if there is a correlation between these factors and government stability. The results show that there is a correlation between polarization as divergence and government stability, acting as a stabilizing factor. However, there is also a correlation between polarization as extremity and government destabilization. Therefore, the conclusion of this paper highlights the importance of distinguishing between these two understandings of polarization. Depending on the type of polarization, it can either be a positive or negative factor for government stability. The paper concludes with a discussion on the different causal explanations and how researchers can proceed to gain a deeper understanding of the subject.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. , p. 43
Keywords [en]
government stability, polarization as divergence, polarization as extremity, outer-edge parties
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229517OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-229517DiVA, id: diva2:1896935
Available from: 2024-09-11 Created: 2024-09-11 Last updated: 2024-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(580 kB)45 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 580 kBChecksum SHA-512
76a159c294ddd956fc866ec862bb3ea3a64b3d23b413c23faa0c92a2cb69d4c640de1838462dad7daef4ff05bad016c1f9535957a271fb347a0af3654a63480a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 45 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf