Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Health professionals’ experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0566-0457
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Aga Khan University, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Department of Obstetrics and Gyneacology, Aga Khan University, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Women's health., ISSN 1745-5057, E-ISSN 1745-5065, Vol. 20, article id 17455057241273675Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management.

Objectives: To explore health professionals’ perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Material and Methods: Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, n = 307 and midwives/nurses, n = 329).

Results: Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26–3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10–4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08–4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30–4.87).

Conclusions: Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2024. Vol. 20, article id 17455057241273675
Keywords [en]
clinical management, cross-sectional study, health professionals, maternal healthcare, obstetric ultrasound, pregnancy, Tanzania, ultrasound training
National Category
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229292DOI: 10.1177/17455057241273675ISI: 001302185800001PubMedID: 39206633Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85202656862OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-229292DiVA, id: diva2:1897927
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilUmeå UniversityAvailable from: 2024-09-16 Created: 2024-09-16 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(741 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 741 kBChecksum SHA-512
6e0ae71c9abbf793bf072303c16a8b61e764ccf70a9f59e0bbb2aef9075cc40dd400da2cd43fcdfae508dd6b96bb49f5451ef5daff338ceedccad83417470233
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bergström, CeciliaHolmlund, SophiaSemasaka Sengoma, Jean PaulMogren, Ingrid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bergström, CeciliaHolmlund, SophiaSemasaka Sengoma, Jean PaulMogren, Ingrid
By organisation
Obstetrics and GynecologyDepartment of Nursing
In the same journal
Women's health.
Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive MedicineNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 56 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 168 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf