Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The diagnostic accuracy of cystoscopy for detecting bladder cancer in adults presenting with haematuria: a systematic review from the european association of urology guidelines office
Department of Urology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology.
Department of Urology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, Netherlands.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: European Urology Focus, E-ISSN 2405-4569, Vol. 10, no 1, p. 115-122Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context: Haematuria can be macroscopic (visible haematuria [VH]) or microscopic (nonvisible haematuria [NVH]), and may be caused by a number of underlying aetiologies. Currently, in case of haematuria, cystoscopy is the standard diagnostic tool to screen the entire bladder for malignancy.

Objective: The objective of this systematic review is to determine the diagnostic test accuracy of cystoscopy (compared with other tests, eg, computed tomography, urine biomarkers, and urine cytology) for detecting bladder cancer in adults.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of the literature was performed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) extension for diagnostic test accuracy studies’ checklist. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Cochrane CDSR databases (via Ovid) were searched up to July 13, 2022. The population comprises patients presenting with either VH or NVH, without previous urological cancers. Two reviewers independently screened all articles, searched reference lists of retrieved articles, and performed data extraction. The risk of bias was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2).

Evidence synthesis: Overall, nine studies were included in the qualitative analysis. Seven out of nine included trials covered the use of cystoscopy in comparison with radiological imaging. Overall, sensitivity of cystoscopy ranged from 87% to 100%, specificity from 64% to 100%, positive predictive value from 79% to 98%, and negative predictive values between 98% and 100%. Two trials compared enhanced or air cystoscopy versus conventional cystoscopy. Overall sensitivity of conventional white light cystoscopy ranged from 47% to 100% and specificity from 93.4% to 100%.

Conclusions: The true accuracy of cystoscopy for the detection of bladder cancer within the context of haematuria has not been studied extensively, resulting in inconsistent data regarding its performance for patients with haematuria. In comparison with imaging modalities, a few trials have prospectively assessed the diagnostic performance of cystoscopy, confirming very high accuracy for cystoscopy, exceeding the diagnostic value of any other imaging test.

Patient summary: Evidence of tests for detecting bladder cancer in adults presenting with haematuria (blood in urine) was reviewed. The most common test used was cystoscopy, which remains the current standard for diagnosing bladder cancer.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 10, no 1, p. 115-122
Keywords [en]
Accuracy, Cystoscopy, Early detection, Haematuria, Systematic review
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-229682DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.002ISI: 001203220600001PubMedID: 37633791Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85169055476OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-229682DiVA, id: diva2:1898138
Available from: 2024-09-16 Created: 2024-09-16 Last updated: 2025-02-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1113 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1113 kBChecksum SHA-512
97f048dc6bedd657c1ef7c2cef67ac4d00bafd38bad2ad32c9236a2597ae123e73bfc2130068dd94135f6a87bf03c625e6091d36f3a96efd61020ae2c34b95d3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus
By organisation
Urology and Andrology
In the same journal
European Urology Focus
Clinical Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 140 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf