Future directions for deep ocean climate science and evidence-based decision makingDepartment of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States.
South Atlantic Environmental Research Institute, Stanley, Falkland Islands.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States.
Oden Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States; Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Your Ocean Consulting, LLC, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
FRB-CESAB, Fondation pour la Recherche sur la Biodiversité – Centre de Synthèse et d'Analyse sur la Biodiversité, Montpellier, France.
Posgrado en Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.
Pinngortitaleriffik Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Greenland Climate Research Centre, Nuuk, Greenland; Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Department of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States.
Instituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Department of Nutrition, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Sciences and Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen and Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway.
Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.
Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute, Gloucester, MA, United States.
National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom.
School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, United States.
Minderoo-UWA Deep-Sea Research Centre, School of Biological Sciences and UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Abdelmalek Essaadi University, Tétouan, Morocco.
Oxford University Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Nekton Foundation, Oxford, United Kingdom; 26The Biodiversity Consultancy, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
CEREGE, Aix Marseille University, CNRS, IRD, INRAE, College de France, Aix-en-Provence, France.
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Frontiers in Climate, E-ISSN 2624-9553, Vol. 6, article id 1445694Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Introduction: A defining aspect of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessment reports (AR) is a formal uncertainty language framework that emphasizes higher certainty issues across the reports, especially in the executive summaries and short summaries for policymakers. As a result, potentially significant risks involving understudied components of the climate system are shielded from view.
Methods: Here we seek to address this in the latest, sixth assessment report (AR6) for one such component—the deep ocean—by summarizing major uncertainties (based on discussions of low confidence issues or gaps) regarding its role in our changing climate system. The goal is to identify key research priorities to improve IPCC confidence levels in deep ocean systems and facilitate the dissemination of IPCC results regarding potentially high impact deep ocean processes to decision-makers. This will accelerate improvement of global climate projections and aid in informing efforts to mitigate climate change impacts. An analysis of 3,000 pages across the six selected AR6 reports revealed 219 major science gaps related to the deep ocean. These were categorized by climate stressor and nature of impacts.
Results: Half of these are biological science gaps, primarily surrounding our understanding of changes in ocean ecosystems, fisheries, and primary productivity. The remaining science gaps are related to uncertainties in the physical (32%) and biogeochemical (15%) ocean states and processes. Model deficiencies are the leading cited cause of low certainty in the physical ocean and ice states, whereas causes of biological uncertainties are most often attributed to limited studies and observations or conflicting results.
Discussion: Key areas for coordinated effort within the deep ocean observing and modeling community have emerged, which will improve confidence in the deep ocean state and its ongoing changes for the next assessment report. This list of key “known unknowns” includes meridional overturning circulation, ocean deoxygenation and acidification, primary production, food supply and the ocean carbon cycle, climate change impacts on ocean ecosystems and fisheries, and ocean-based climate interventions. From these findings, we offer recommendations for AR7 to avoid omitting low confidence-high risk changes in the climate system.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2024. Vol. 6, article id 1445694
Keywords [en]
deep sea, climate science, evidence-based decision making, IPCC, uncertainty, vulnerability and risk
National Category
Climate Science Oceanography, Hydrology and Water Resources
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-231396DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2024.1445694OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-231396DiVA, id: diva2:1910121
2024-11-042024-11-042025-02-01Bibliographically approved