Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery dissection in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: a randomized controlled trial (SONOCHOL-trial)
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research Dalarna, Uppsala University, Falun, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Mora Lasarett, Mora, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery. Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8947-4736
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6897-2058
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: World Journal of Emergency Surgery, E-ISSN 1749-7922, Vol. 19, no 1, article id 34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection presents a compelling alternative to conventional electrocautery. The evidence for elective cholecystectomy supports the adoption of ultrasonic dissection, citing advantages such as reduced operating time, diminished bleeding, shorter hospital stays and decreased postoperative pain and nausea. However, the efficacy of this procedure in emergency surgery and patients diagnosed with acute cholecystitis remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of electrocautery and ultrasonic dissection in patients with acute cholecystitis.

METHODS: A randomized, parallel, double-blinded, multicentre controlled trial was conducted across eight Swedish hospitals. Eligible participants were individuals aged ≥ 18 years with acute cholecystitis lasting ≤ 7 days. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed in the emergency setting as soon as local circumstances permitted. Random allocation to electrocautery or ultrasonic dissection was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the total complication rate, analysed using an intention-to-treat approach. The primary outcome was analysed using logistic generalized estimated equations. Patients, postoperative caregivers, and follow-up personnel were blinded to group assignment.

RESULTS: From September 2019 to March 2023, 300 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to electrocautery dissection (n = 148) and ultrasonic dissection (n = 152). No significant difference in complication rate was observed between the groups (risk difference [RD] 1.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI], - 7.2% to 10.4%, P = 0.720). No significant disparities in operating time, conversion rate, hospital stay or readmission rates between the groups were noted. Haemostatic agents were more frequently used in electrocautery dissection (RD 10.6%, 95% CI, 1.3% to 19.8%, P = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonic dissection and electrocautery dissection demonstrate comparable risks for complications in emergency surgery for patients with acute cholecystitis. Ultrasonic dissection is a viable alternative to electrocautery dissection or can be used as a complementary method in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to conducting the research on  http://clinical.trials.gov, NCT03014817.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2024. Vol. 19, no 1, article id 34
Keywords [en]
Acute care surgery, Acute cholecystitis, Electrocoagulation, Electrosurgery, General surgery, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Minimally invasive surgical procedures, Ultrasonic surgical procedures
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-232216DOI: 10.1186/s13017-024-00565-4ISI: 001353697100001PubMedID: 39538278Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85209189339OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-232216DiVA, id: diva2:1916463
Funder
Karolinska InstituteRegion StockholmAvailable from: 2024-11-27 Created: 2024-11-27 Last updated: 2024-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1154 kB)30 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1154 kBChecksum SHA-512
30e1d8bc5d1df22621e56bd66ca7bd4986eb52d0416e636c86972355298ec1894689a74b391ca4bc6409dd88b2e2b55809d1277d6c972ded71a1591ea2936b6e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Enochsson, LarsCengiz, YücelBayadsi, HaythamHennings, Joakim

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Enochsson, LarsCengiz, YücelBayadsi, HaythamHennings, Joakim
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionSurgery
In the same journal
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 30 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 236 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf