In boreal streams, restoration after channelization typically consists of increasing instream geomorphic complexity with no other active restoration measures (e.g. planting) as it mainly targets fish. Unsurprisingly, this restoration fails to restore riparian vegetation within the time frames needed to meet biodiversity goals. To understand the potential role of dispersal and seed banks in the poor restoration results, we compared deposition patterns from a seed release experiment conducted during spring flood and summer low flow conditions to seed bank- and vegetation composition. The experiment was conducted across seven boreal streams, each differing in time since restoration (0–22 years). We found that seed deposition increased due to low flow and local flow obstruction, suggesting the importance of instream boulders. Locations where there was a high deposition likelihood in our seed release experiment had higher Shannon diversity compared to locations with a low seed deposition likelihood. Riparian vegetation composition is related to flow obstruction, while seed bank species composition is correlated to spring flood seed deposition. In general, the sampled riparian seed banks contained few seeds and species. We therefore conclude that (1) restoration of hydrogeomorphic complexity (especially instream boulders) can enhance seed deposition with some effects on species composition of the vegetation and seed bank diversity, and (2) the importance of these generally species poor seed banks for the return of species after restoration boreal streams is questionable. Other (active) methods or more time may therefore be needed to meet biodiversity goals within riparian vegetation restoration.