Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Long-term outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients
Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Division of Orthopaedics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5469-2730
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, ISSN 1863-9933, E-ISSN 1863-9941, Vol. 51, no 1, article id 73Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Total hip replacement (THR) is commonly used for active and lucid elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF). Historically, cemented stems have been favoured, demonstrating superior early outcomes. Controversy still exists regarding the use of cemented or uncemented stems in the most active group of patients with FNF and there is a need for extended follow-up studies to assess long-term outcome of cemented and uncemented stem results.

METHODS: A 4 and 10-year follow-up was conducted on a single-centre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Patients aged 65-79 years with an acute displaced FNF (Garden III-IV) were included, and surgeries were performed between 2009 and 2014. The study was terminated after an interim analysis indicated that the total number of early hip-related complications was substantially higher in the uncemented group. Baseline and follow-up assessments included hip-related complications, reoperations, health-related quality of life scores, Harris hip score and pain ratings.

RESULTS: In total, 69 patients were randomized. At 4 years, there were 8 complications in the uncemented group and 2 complications in the cemented groups. The uncemented group had several periprosthetic fractures and dislocations necessitating revisions in several cases. From 4 to 10 years, the cemented group showed a single periprosthetic fracture, while none occurred in the uncemented group. The total number of complications during the study period were 8 in the uncemented group and 3 in the cemented group. The median Harris hip score for the uncemented group remained consistent at 81 for both the 4- and 10-year follow-ups. In contrast, the cemented group showed scores of 92 and 93 at the respective 4- and 10-year follow-ups, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Health-related quality of life and pain ratings were similar between groups throughout the study.

CONCLUSION: Our study presents a 10-year follow-up of uncemented femoral stems in THR for elderly FNF patients. Our findings not only underscore the importance of cautious decision-making in selecting patients for uncemented implants, but also highlight that most patients suitable for THR would benefit from a cemented arthroplasty to avoid an increased risk of short-term complications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 51, no 1, article id 73
Keywords [en]
Cervical hip fractures, Elderly, Femoral, Hip arthroplasty, Hip replacement, RCT
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-235831DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02735-0ISI: 001428252400002PubMedID: 39982453OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-235831DiVA, id: diva2:1939594
Available from: 2025-02-24 Created: 2025-02-24 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1286 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1286 kBChecksum SHA-512
2b83f05b1f440fffa25c43da746141572755c9805c3a847b25ec697fa86d6844b7e970f261c315f6a4491db6b95611974a24aeefc10bb777dc1cac4b6a9a732b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records

Mukka, Sebastian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mukka, Sebastian
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionOrthopaedics
In the same journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 30 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 102 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf