Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Clinical education: nursing students’ experiences with multisource feedback using a digital assessment instrument in the emergency medical Service: a qualitative study
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Computer Science and Media Technology, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden.
Department for Neurobiology, Care Sciences, and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1386-3203
2025 (English)In: BMC Medical Education, E-ISSN 1472-6920, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 391Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Clinical education in Emergency services (EMS) is unique due to its dynamic environment, brief patient encounters, and unpredictable cases. EMS provides valuable learning opportunities for nursing students, fostering person-centered care approaches and a variation of clinical training and learning. Formative feedback is crucial to develop knowledge and skills. Multisource feedback (MSF) offers a comprehensive assessment by incorporating feedback from various individuals, promoting self-reflection and targeted learning. MSF has not, to our knowledge, been systematically evaluated in the context of EMS, and therefore, the aim of the study was to describe nursing students’ experiences with MSF during their clinical education in the EMS, using a digital instrument as a facilitating tool.

Methods: A qualitative design with an inductive approach was used. Data were collected in 2021, using focus group interviews (n = 4) with 31 final-semester nursing students in Stockholm, Sweden, who had conducted clinical education in the EMS and received MSF through a digital instrument. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, guided by Braun and Clarke’s methodology.

Results: Three themes revealed: feedback from sources familiar with the student’s learning objectives, feedback from sources unfamiliar with the learning objectives, and general perceptions of MSF in the EMS. Students valued self-reflection and feedback from peers and supervisors for personal and professional growth. Patient feedback was challenging due to their limited contextual understanding and emotional states, while feedback from other healthcare professionals was appreciated but hindered by the healthcare professionals’ workload and timing constraints. Overall, students appreciated MSF’s diverse perspectives, enriching their learning, performance, and development.

Conclusion: This study underscores the value of MSF in nursing students’ clinical education within the EMS. Feedback from peers, supervisors, and self-reflection enhances self-awareness, professional growth, and mutual support. Despite challenges like stress and logistical barriers, structured support and a digital instrument improved accessibility and alignment with learning objectives for the students. Incorporating patient and healthcare professionals’ feedback enriches education by promoting patient-centred care and collaboration. MSF supported reflective practice, and team dynamics and highlights the need for refined feedback processes to optimize learning and professional development for nursing students during clinical education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 391
Keywords [en]
Clinical education, Emergency services, Formative feedback, Multicourse feedback, Nursing, Reflection
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-237139DOI: 10.1186/s12909-025-06950-0ISI: 001446326800001PubMedID: 40098126Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000377180OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-237139DiVA, id: diva2:1952351
Available from: 2025-04-15 Created: 2025-04-15 Last updated: 2025-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1174 kB)20 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1174 kBChecksum SHA-512
0206a9933f0c4a3186bf6fffc9c9d6c3189c4e7839c40b24b1009cbb09b4e2741aa26992f04ddccab7b6ba19c2999277305135a4904a0ff00fbca8b7395fe49f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Lindström, Veronica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindström, Veronica
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
BMC Medical Education
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 22 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 126 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf