Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Onlay mesh versus suture repair for smaller umbilical hernias in adults — early results from SUMMER trial: randomized clinical trial
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, Södertalje, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, Södertalje, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyds Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Paediatric Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BJS Open, E-ISSN 2474-9842, Vol. 9, no 1, article id zrae173Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Mesh repair is recommended for umbilical hernias larger than 1 cm to reduce recurrence rates, yet current evidence remains limited for smaller umbilical hernias. Important questions concern optimal mesh positioning and wound complications/ surgical-site occurrences. The aim of this study was to report the preliminary results of a trial investigating surgical-site occurrences in suture versus mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than or equal to 2 cm.

Methods: A randomized, controlled, parallel-group, double-blind, multicentre trial across six Swedish surgical units is comparing 4 × 4 cm macroporous lightweight onlay mesh repair with conventional suture repair for primary elective umbilical hernias less than or equal to 2 cm. Intraoperative centralized web-based randomization ensured allocation concealment. The primary outcome of the trial is recurrence at 3 years, whereas secondary outcomes (the focus of this study) include surgical-site occurrences and pain intensity at 30 days post-surgery.

Results: From February 2020 to January 2024, 290 participants were randomly assigned to either suture or mesh repair. After exclusion and loss to follow-up, the remaining population for analysis was 144 participants for suture repair and 135 participants for mesh repair. Surgical-site occurrences (Clavien–Dindo grade greater than or equal to I) affected 32 mesh repair participants (23.7%) compared with 26 suture repair participants (18.1%), without any significant increase in surgical-site occurrences for mesh repair (OR 1.39 (95% c.i. 0.78 to 2.51)). Clinically relevant surgical-site occurrences (Clavien–Dindo grade greater than or equal to II) were less common in the mesh group (2 participants; 1.5%) compared with the suture group (4 participants; 2.8%). The median duration of surgery was 32 min for suture repair and 45 min for mesh repair (P < 0.001). Assessment of pain intensity revealed that 82.0% of suture repair participants and 73.0% of mesh repair participants reported no pain (P = 0.061).

Conclusion: This randomized clinical trial provides high-level evidence for mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than or equal to 2 cm. With regard to early postoperative outcomes, such as surgical-site occurrences, onlay mesh repair can be considered comparable to suture repair and is safe to use for smaller umbilical hernias.

Registration number: NCT04231071 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025. Vol. 9, no 1, article id zrae173
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-237685DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae173ISI: 001437629800001PubMedID: 40037347Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-86000504384OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-237685DiVA, id: diva2:1953845
Funder
Region StockholmKarolinska InstituteAvailable from: 2025-04-23 Created: 2025-04-23 Last updated: 2025-04-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(360 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 360 kBChecksum SHA-512
e7c74777cf7bd19d26d43061831c408f3f5573186cc28569e95625fd469dcf0646cfcf402abf3863106132d319071d99d570e1baf4445baca393a0995c6f5bb5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Granåsen, Gabriel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Granåsen, Gabriel
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
In the same journal
BJS Open
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 15 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 187 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf