Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The role of women’s empowerment in fertility preferences and outcomes: analysis of the 2017 Indonesia demographic and health survey
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0791-0256
Department of Statistical Methods, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, 50005, Spain.
Department of Health Behavior, Environment and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BMC Women's Health, E-ISSN 1472-6874, Vol. 25, no 1, article id 211Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: With a population of 275 million, Indonesia is the world’s fourth most populous country and has made considerable efforts to reduce its Total Fertility Rate from 5.6 in 1971 to a target of 2.1 by 2024. Women’s empowerment has been identified as a critical factor influencing fertility dynamics, gender equality, reproductive autonomy, and broader socioeconomic development. This study examines the association between four dimensions of women’s empowerment and three fertility-related outcomes among married women aged 22 years and older in Indonesia.

Methods: We used cross-sectional data from 34,017 married women participating in the 2017 Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (IDHS). An outcome-wide analytical approach was adopted to explore three outcomes: total number of children ever born, ideal number of children, and fertility preference alignment, i.e. whether actual fertility matched stated preferences. Four empowerment domains were assessed: household decision-making, attitudes toward wife beating, attitudes toward refusing sex, and labour force participation. Stepwise multivariate Poisson regression modelling was applied, adjusting for key demographic and socioeconomic covariates.

Results: Our study found that the association between each type of women’s empowerment and fertility-related outcomes varied, reinforcing the notion that empowerment does not uniformly affect reproductive behaviour. Among the four empowerment indicators, rejecting all justifications for wife beating emerged as the most consistent and significant predictor across all fertility outcomes. It was association with fewer children ever born (β = 0.03), a lower ideal number of children (β = 0.04), and a higher likelihood of meeting fertility preferences (PR = 1.02). Attitudes toward refusing sex were also significantly associated with fewer children (β = 0.02) and lower fertility ideals (β = 0.07). However, participation in decision-making and labour force participation showed mixed or non-significant associations, indicating that different empowerment dimensions may influence reproductive behaviour in diverse ways.

Conclusions: Women’s empowerment - particularly in the domains of gender-based violence and sexual autonomy - is closely linked to fertility preferences and behaviours. The findings underscore that empowerment is a multidimensional construct, with varying influences across its domains. Strengthening women’s autonomy and addressing gender-based violence are essential steps toward enhancing reproductive rights and achieving Sustainable Development Goal 5 in Indonesia. Gender-sensitive data systems and interventions tailored to different aspects of empowerment are urgently needed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central (BMC), 2025. Vol. 25, no 1, article id 211
Keywords [en]
Women’s empowerment, Fertility preference, Reproductive autonomy, Gender-based violence, Decisionmaking, Indonesia, Demographic and Health Survey
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238326DOI: 10.1186/s12905-025-03748-6ISI: 001479683000001PubMedID: 40307733Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105003864488OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238326DiVA, id: diva2:1955898
Available from: 2025-05-02 Created: 2025-05-02 Last updated: 2025-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1583 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1583 kBChecksum SHA-512
601bace6de27cbe517a4dd9a46cdaf6dbaf224732d38b5809c8ef677093563bf5b23c759b6237e2eb24310fd6e2603156ca06abaa25eab2700170d69efb77613
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Vaezghasemi, MasoudSchröders, Julia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Vaezghasemi, MasoudSchröders, Julia
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
BMC Women's Health
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf