Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Who should manage protected areas in the Swedish mountain region?: A survey approach to co-management
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2008 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Management, ISSN 0301-4797, Vol. 87, no 1, 154-164 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article investigates attitudes towards co-management of protected areas in Sweden, at the national, county and local level. In Sweden, protected areas are still primarily designated and managed hierarchically—a practice increasingly contested by people living close to them, including indigenous Sámi reindeer herders whose economic activities are located within protected areas. The general view could, on the contrary, be anticipated to be pro-state since protected areas are considered to be of national interest. For democratic reasons, however, the opinions of the whole population should be considered. In order to measure both local and general views, this study is based on a two-sample survey of 8868 respondents. The objectives are to map and explain attitudes regarding who should manage protected areas in Sweden, and to test the usefulness of a multi-level quantitative method. Such an approach is unusual in co-management literature that is empirically mainly based on local case studies. The explanatory ambition sets out to test three hypotheses drawn from common-pool resource theory; resource dependency, common understanding, and trust. Perhaps surprisingly, the results show that a considerable majority of the respondents (at all levels) wish to see self- or co-management. All three hypotheses are important to understand attitudes toward the management of protected areas, but not always in the way that the theory anticipates.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , ScienceDirect , 2008. Vol. 87, no 1, 154-164 p.
Keyword [en]
Co-management, Protected areas, Swedish mountain region
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-19572DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.010OAI: diva2:202038
Available from: 2009-03-06 Created: 2009-03-06 Last updated: 2009-12-14
In thesis
1. Commons protected for or from the people?: Co-management in the Swedish mountain region?
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Commons protected for or from the people?: Co-management in the Swedish mountain region?
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Protected areas have so far been the primary means to conserve biodiversity, an increasingly important environmental issue, but proposals to establish protected areas are often met by local resistance due to fears that user rights will be severely restrained. Nature conservation traditionally aims to preserve an ideal state of nature, in which interference by people is minimized through a number of regulations, and where central authorities are in charge. Increasingly, however, conservation policy emphasizes participation. Protected area designations are about institutional change where customary and legal rights to use and manage certain resources are renegotiated. Protected areas can be considered as multi-use and multi-level commons that may benefit from co-management where the state cooperates with user groups, municipalities, research institutions and others.

This thesis analyzes the establishment phase of the co-management of multi-level, multi-use commons in order to characterize design principles common to the emergence of co-management processes which improve institutional robustness.

The thesis is based on a quantitative survey study and a small-n comparative case study. Paper I compares national, regional and local public opinions about protected areas through a multi-level survey. Papers II to IV each presents a case study of a designation process within the Swedish mountain region. The qualitative case studies are based on the structured, focused comparison method and employ within-case analysis and process-tracing. The material examined consisted of written documenta­tion and 41 semi-structured interviews.

The two studies contribute to commons theory; the focus on the establishment phase provides opportunities to acquire abundant information about how contextual and process factors influence the functioning of a co-management arrangement. Paper I suggests that national public opinion is an important contextual variable for natural resources of national interest, and shows that 65% of the Swedish population support local or co-management of protected areas. Papers II to IV reveal that the rigidity of the existing institutional framework is another important contextual variable that influences the degree of learning taking place. Further, the comparative analysis proposes that certain characteristics of a process (the co-management process principles) are essential for the realization of co-management arrangements of multi-level and multi-use commons. The principles are representation, reason(ableness), powers, accountability and learning.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Umeå universitet, 2009. 67 p.
Statsvetenskapliga institutionens skriftserie, ISSN 0349-0831 ; 2009:3
commons, co-management, governance, multi-level survey, deliberation, accountability, conflict resolution mechanisms, learning
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-30150 (URN)978-91-7264-889-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-01-22, Samhällsvetarhuset, Hörsal C, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:15 (Swedish)
Available from: 2009-12-18 Created: 2009-12-09 Last updated: 2009-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zachrisson, Anna
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 185 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link