Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Odontology, Prosthetic Dentistry.
1998 (English)In: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, ISSN 0001-6357, Vol. 56, no 5, 263-7 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sixty-six class-II CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays (Cerec) were placed in 27 patients. Each patient received at least one inlay luted with a dual-cured resin composite and one inlay luted with a chemically cured resin composite. The inlays were examined 5 years after luting using the California Dental Association (CDA) criteria. Eighty-nine percent of the 66 inlays were rated 'satisfactory'. During the follow-up period replacement was required for 3 inlays because of inlay fractures (4.5%) and 1 inlay because of fracture of the tooth substance (1.5%). All those inlays were luted with the dual-cured resin composite luting agent. Of the remaining 62 inlays the CDA rating 'excellent' was given to 84% for color, 97% for surface, and 81% for anatomic form. 'Excellent' margin integrity was seen in 52% of the dual-cured resin composite luted inlays and in 61% of the chemically cured resin composite luted inlays. No statistically significant (P> 0.05) difference was observed between the two luting agents.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1998. Vol. 56, no 5, 263-7 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-19344PubMedID: 9860093OAI: diva2:207554
Available from: 2009-03-11 Created: 2009-03-05 Last updated: 2009-03-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

By organisation
Prosthetic Dentistry
In the same journal
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 13 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link