umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A rebuttal of the views expressed in "Problems of unscientific method and approach in Archaeological soil and pollen analysis of experimental floor deposits; with special reference to Butser Ancient Farm, Hampshire, UK by R.I. Macphail, G.M. Cruise, M. Allen, J. Linderholm and P. Reynolds" by Matthew Canti, Stephen Carter, Donald Davidson and Susan Limbrey
2006 (English)In: Journal of Archaeological Science, Vol. 33, no 2, 299-305 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 33, no 2, 299-305 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-18766OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-18766DiVA: diva2:208094
Note
0305-4403 doi: DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2005.07.002Available from: 2009-03-16 Created: 2009-02-24 Last updated: 2009-03-16

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WH8-4H16P9R-1/2/116f3d197d75d6f32b578030e84f94e6

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Linderholm, Johan

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf