Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A corrected value-at-risk predictor
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
2010 (English)In: Applied Economics Letters, ISSN 1350-4851, E-ISSN 1466-4291, Vol. 17, no 12, 1193-1196 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this note it is argued that the estimation error in Value-at-Risk predictors gives rise to underestimation of portfolio risk. We propose a simple correction and in an empirical illustration we find that it is economically relevant.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 17, no 12, 1193-1196 p.
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-22197DOI: 10.1080/17446540902817619ISI: 000280264200012OAI: diva2:213643
Available from: 2009-04-27 Created: 2009-04-27 Last updated: 2012-01-30Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On Risk Prediction
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On Risk Prediction
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis comprises four papers concerning risk prediction.

Paper [I] suggests a nonlinear and multivariate time series model

framework that enables the study of simultaneity in returns and in

volatilities, as well as asymmetric effects arising from shocks. Using

daily data 2000-2006 for the Baltic state stock exchanges and that of

Moscow we find recursive structures with Riga directly depending in

returns on Tallinn and Vilnius, and Tallinn on Vilnius. For volatilities

both Riga and Vilnius depend on Tallinn. In addition, we find evidence

of asymmetric effects of shocks arising in Moscow and in the Baltic states

on both returns and volatilities.

Paper [II] argues that the estimation error in Value at Risk predictors

gives rise to underestimation of portfolio risk. A simple correction is

proposed and in an empirical illustration it is found to be economically


Paper [III] studies some approximation approaches to computing the

Value at Risk and the Expected Shortfall for multiple period asset re-

turns. Based on the result of a simulation experiment we conclude that

among the approaches studied the one based on assuming a skewed t dis-

tribution for the multiple period returns and that based on simulations

were the best. We also found that the uncertainty due to the estimation

error can be quite accurately estimated employing the delta method. In

an empirical illustration we computed five day Value at Risk's for the

S&P 500 index. The approaches performed about equally well.

Paper [IV] argues that the practise used in the valuation of the port-

folio is important for the calculation of the Value at Risk. In particular,

when liquidating a large portfolio the seller may not face horizontal de-

mandcurves. We propose a partially new approach for incorporating

this fact in the Value at Risk and in an empirical illustration we compare

it to a competing approach. We find substantial differences.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2009
Umeå economic studies, ISSN 0348-1018 ; 770
Finance, Time series, GARCH, Estimation error, Asymmetry, Supply and demand
National Category
Research subject
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-22200 (URN)
Public defence
2009-05-20, S312, Samhällsvetarhuset , Umeå Universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (English)
Available from: 2009-04-29 Created: 2009-04-27 Last updated: 2009-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lönnbark, Carl
By organisation
Department of Economics
In the same journal
Applied Economics Letters

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 77 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link