Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Groupthink in temporary organizations
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business.
2010 (English)In: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, ISSN 1753-8378, Vol. 3, no 1, 94-110 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the understanding of groupthink in temporary organizations. Only anecdotally has the literature touched upon how the temporary organization's structure may foster groupthink. Studies of faulty group processes are imperative since temporary organizations are becoming more common. Design/methodology/approach – Following the design used by several authors who analyzed the Everest events, this paper is an historic in-depth case study based on accounts of several survivors. Findings – Three out of four features of groupthink are found and analyzing the Everest events there are several symptoms to groupthink that may be present in any temporary organization. Research limitations/implications – Groupthink as a theoretical idea is well developed but has received limited attention in a temporary organization (project) setting. More attention should be given to group dynamics in general and groupthink in particular. Practical implications – Some practices are suggested to avoid groupthink. Furthermore, project managers find themselves in a balancing act between freedom, efficiency, and fast decisions. The context should be allowed to decide which the correct approach is. Finally, blowing the whistle should never be a problem and never be punished. Originality/value – The setting of this paper is original although it is to the structure a common project. When life is at stake, features and symptoms of groupthink become more evident. The theoretical field is almost non-existent in a temporary organization setting hence there is a considerable value to the theoretical development of temporary organizations and groupthink.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing , 2010. Vol. 3, no 1, 94-110 p.
Keyword [en]
Group thinking, Mountains, Organizational structures, Project management
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-32654DOI: 10.1108/17538371011014044OAI: diva2:304783
Available from: 2010-03-19 Created: 2010-03-19 Last updated: 2011-03-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hällgren, Markus
By organisation
Umeå School of Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 181 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link