umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Hyperglycemia and stroke mortality: comparison between fasting and 2-h glucose criteria.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Diabetes Care, ISSN 0149-5992, E-ISSN 1935-5548, Vol. 32, no 2, 348-354 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: We investigated stroke mortality in individuals in different categories of glycemia and compared hazard ratios (HRs) corresponding to a 1-SD increase in 2-h plasma glucose and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criteria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We examined data from 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance tests taken from 13 European cohorts comprising 11,844 (55%) men and 9,862 (45%) women who were followed up for a median of 10.5 years. A multivariate adjusted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate HRs for stroke mortality. RESULTS: In men and women without a prior history of diabetes, multivariate adjusted HRs for stroke mortality corresponding to a 1-SD increase in FPG were 1.02 (95% CI 0.83-1.25) and 1.52 (1.22-1.88) and those in 2-h plasma glucose 1.21 (1.06-1.38) and 1.31 (1.06-1.61), respectively. Addition of 2-h plasma glucose to the model with FPG significantly improved prediction of stroke mortality in men (chi2 = 10.12; P = 0.001) but not in women (chi2 = 0.01; P = 0.94), whereas addition of FPG to 2-h plasma glucose improved stroke mortality in women (chi2 = 4.08; P = 0.04) but not in men (chi2 = 3.29; P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes defined by either FPG or 2-h plasma glucose increases the risk of stroke mortality. In individuals without a history of diabetes, elevated 2-h postchallenge glucose is a better predictor than elevated fasting glucose in men, whereas the latter is better than the former in women.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 32, no 2, 348-354 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-32934DOI: 10.2337/dc08-1411PubMedID: 19017775OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-32934DiVA: diva2:306776
Available from: 2010-03-31 Created: 2010-03-31 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stegmayr, Birgitta
By organisation
Medicine
In the same journal
Diabetes Care
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf