Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ontogenetic diet shifters profit competitively from predation
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. (Aquatic Ecology)
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. (Theoretical Ecology)
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. (Aquatic Ecology)
(English)Manuscript (preprint) (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Integrating the simultaneous impacts of predation and resource competition on ecological communities is a major topic in community ecology. A number of studies have provided mechanisms that cause predation to affect competition between consumers for common resources especially in relation to resource productivity. We investigated how competition for two resources between two consumers of which one underwent an ontogenetic diet shift whereas the other was a generalist over its entire life time was affected by the presence of a predator feeding on both consumer populations. By assuming that consumers in the absence of  ontogenetic niche shifts showed neutral coexistence, we were able to study the effects of  ontogenetic niche shifts per se on competitive interactions. Predators differentially affected the resource requirements of diet shifters and generalist consumers and increased the region of resource supply where diet shifters competitively excluded generalists. Even in the case when generalists were superior competitors independent of resource supply, diet shifters could profit competitively from predators and even exclude the superior competitor when predators were present. Overall, diet shifters thus gained competitively from predation.

URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-33416OAI: diva2:312022
Available from: 2010-05-02 Created: 2010-04-23 Last updated: 2010-05-07Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. The effects of stage-specific differences in energetics on community structure
Open this publication in new window or tab >>The effects of stage-specific differences in energetics on community structure
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

When intraspecific individuals differ in resource intake, scramble competition occurs among inferior individuals growing food-dependently. Scramble can be released through predation mortality. As a consequence of this release, production rates in inferior individuals increase and biomass overcompensation in the subsequent life-stages may occur. When intraspecific individuals do not differ in their resource intakes biomass overcompensation does not occur. If an individual changes its resource intake over ontogeny, the balance of intake and losses, its energetics, will change over ontogeny. Furthermore, differences will arise between the energetics of different life-stages. The predominant volume of interspecific competition theory is based on studies assuming no stage-specific differences in energetics, neglecting the influence of ontogeny on community dynamics altogether. We study how an stage-specific differences in energetics affect expectations from conventional competition theory.

We use a stage-structured biomass model consistently translating individual life history processes, in particular food-dependent growth in body size, to the population level. The stage-structured population can be reduced to an unstructured population, if the energetics of all individuals are assumed to be equal.  The stage-structured model, however can also describe population dynamics when this equality is broken. We use the stage-structured biomass model to contrast the stage-specific differences resulting in a stage-structured population model, with an unstructured population model assuming no differences between stages.

We show that stage-specific differences in energetics can affect competition on various trophic levels. I: In stead of outcompeting each other, a predator can be facilitated by another preying a scrambling prey life-stage of the same prey population. II: In coexistence with their prey, omnivores with an ontogenetic diet shift, where juvenile omnivores feed on resource and adults on prey, affect community structure only as predators, not as competitors to their prey. We show coexistence of omnivore and prey is not possible if the dominating interaction is competition. Feeding on prey, however, alleviates competition with prey and facilitates the introduction of omnivores. III: An ontogenetic diet shift creates niche partitioning, where without it this would result in neutral coexistence of two consumers competing for two resources. IV: Furthermore, predators can change resource requirements of diet shifters such that diet shifters can reduce resources to lower equilibria and sustain higher predator biomass than consumers without stage-specific differences in energetics.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, 2010. 47 p.
ontogenetic diet shift, stage-structured biomass model, food-dependence, growth, development
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences Natural Sciences
Research subject
Earth Sciences with Specialization Environmental Analysis
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-33444 (URN)978-91-7264-996-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-24, KBC-huset , Lilla Hörsalen, KB3A9, Umeå universitet, Linneus väg 6, Umeå, 10:00 (English)
Available from: 2010-05-03 Created: 2010-04-24 Last updated: 2010-05-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schellekens, TimPersson, Lennart
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 27 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link