umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How well do questionnaires on symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders capture the experiences of those who suffer from neck-shoulder disorders?: A content analysis of questionnaires and interviews
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing. Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, S-801 76 Gävle, Sweden .
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, Box 7629, S-907 12 Umeå, Sweden ; Alfta Research Foundation, Box 94, S-822 22 Alfta, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7543-4397
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.
Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Gävle, Box 7629, S-907 12 Umeå, Sweden .
2009 (English)In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, ISSN 1471-2474, E-ISSN 1471-2474, Vol. 10, no 30, 1-14 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Previous research has indicated neck-shoulder disorders to have a fluctuating course incorporating a variety of symptoms. These findings awoke our interest to make a comparison between symptoms experienced by people affected with the disorder and the content of questionnaires that assess pain and other symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders. Thus the aims of this study were: -to explore the symptoms experienced by people with non-specific neck-shoulder problems, as well as experiences of nuances and temporal variations (fluctuations) of symptoms; -to investigate which sources were used in the development of ten questionnaires for assessing pain and other symptoms in the neck-shoulder; -to analyse the item content of the questionnaires; -to analyse the correspondence between the item content of the questionnaires and the symptoms described by the informants. METHODS: Content analysis of interviews with 40 people with non-specific neck-shoulder pain, and 10 questionnaires used to assess pain and other symptoms in neck-shoulder disorders. RESULTS: The interviews revealed a variety of symptoms indicating a bodily, mental/cognitive, and emotional engagement, and more general and severe symptoms than are usually considered in neck-shoulder questionnaires. Taking all questionnaires together many of the symptoms were considered, but most questionnaires only included a few of them. The informants were able to distinguish fluctuation of symptoms, and a variety of different qualities which were not usually considered in the questionnaires. Only two questionnaires had made use of the opinions of affected people in the development. CONCLUSION: Few of the questionnaires had made use of the experiences of affected people in the development. The correspondence between the symptoms expressed by those affected and the content of the questionnaires was low. A variety of symptoms were expressed by the interviewees, and the participants were also able to distinguish nuances and fluctuations of symptoms. The present study points to the importance of other aspects than just pain and physical functioning as clinical trial outcome measures related to neck-shoulder disorders. To develop a condition-specific questionnaire, it is important to decide on the specific symptoms for the condition. Using the experiences of those affected, in combination with relevant research and professional knowledge, can enhance the validity of the questionnaires.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2009. Vol. 10, no 30, 1-14 p.
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-34640DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-30PubMedID: 19272142OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-34640DiVA: diva2:323284
Available from: 2010-06-10 Created: 2010-06-10 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(635 kB)60 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 635 kBChecksum SHA-512
a887fd643249b18e2c650697f970f9d2eea08b3860ec8d0655102e7cf150a48f3a672d09e9ca174265e748fc74e0145c807270e791b4da33c384ddc3a98a158b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wiitavaara, BirgittaBjörklund, MartinBrulin, Christine
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 60 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf