Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Valve replacement for aortic stenosis normalizes subendocardial function in patients with normal ejection fraction.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: European Journal of Echocardiography, ISSN 1525-2167, E-ISSN 1532-2114Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

AIMS: Long-standing aortic stenosis (AS) causes various degrees of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, which may improve after valve replacement. The aim of this study was to assess the nature of LV subendocardial abnormalities in AS and their response to valve replacement (AVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 41 consecutive symptomatic patients (age 64 +/- 13 years) with severe AS, normal LV ejection fraction (EF), but no obstructive coronary artery disease before, a week after AVR, and 6 months after AVR. LV subendocardial function was studied from recordings of long-axis M-mode (amplitude), tissue-Doppler (myocardial velocities) and speckle tracking (myocardial strain) echocardiographic techniques. Results were compared with those from 20 age- and gender-matched controls. In patients, LV dimensions and markers of asynchrony, total isovolumic time (t-IVT), and Tei index were not different from controls before AVR and remained unchanged afterwards. LV lateral long-axis amplitude, as well as lateral and septal systolic velocities and strain, were reduced (P < 0.001 for all) and E/E' was modestly raised. Lateral long-axis amplitude, systolic and diastolic velocities normalized within a week of AVR but strain lagged behind until 6 months later. The reduced septal long-axis amplitude remained permanently unchanged (NS) despite the early normalization of its systolic velocities (P < 0.001) and strain (P < 0.001). LV mass normalized at 6 months after AVR (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe AS and maintained LV ejection fraction, subendocardial function is globally abnormal showing reduced amplitude of motion, velocities, and strain. The different response of its components suggests an evidence for differential reverse remodelling, irrespective of myocardial mass regression.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-34737DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jeq026ISI: 000280704100013PubMedID: 20219771OAI: diva2:324406
Advance Access published March 10, 2010; Received 3 December 2009; accepted after revision 11 February 2010Available from: 2010-06-15 Created: 2010-06-15 Last updated: 2011-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindqvist, PerHenein, Michael Y
By organisation
In the same journal
European Journal of Echocardiography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link