umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Odontology.
2010 (English)In: Dental Materials, ISSN 0109-5641, E-ISSN 1879-0097, Vol. 26, no 9, 940-946 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical retention to dentin of a two-step self-etching adhesive system Clearfil SE Bond and a two-step etch-and-rinse system PQ1. METHODS: A total of 119 Class V restorations were placed in non-carious cervical lesions without intentional involvement of the enamel incisal of the lesions. The restorations were evaluated yearly during an 8-year follow-up. Clinical dentin bonding efficiency was determined by the percentage of lost restorations at each of the recalls. RESULTS: At 8 years, 112 restorations could be evaluated. Both adhesives fulfilled the ADA 18-month full acceptance criteria for retention with a retention rate of 90.6% for PQ1 and 98.2% for Clearfil SE Bond. The loss rates increased then considerably after 2 and 3 years, respectively. The cumulative loss rates at 8 years were 25.5% for Clearfil SE and 39.3% for PQ1 (p=0.12). No significant differences were observed between lesions with sclerotic and non-sclerotic dentin. The size of the lesions did not influence the bonding effectiveness. A lower loss rate was found for the restorations placed in lesions slightly roughened before etching. CONCLUSION: Both adhesive systems showed acceptable short-term clinical retention to dentin, which decreased after long-time in vivo aging, especially for the simplified etch-and-rinse system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 26, no 9, 940-946 p.
Keyword [en]
Adhesion, Clinical, Dent material, Etch, Resin, Restoration, Self-etch
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-35152DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.05.009ISI: 000280613200015PubMedID: 20646753OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-35152DiVA: diva2:331956
Available from: 2010-07-29 Created: 2010-07-29 Last updated: 2011-10-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

van Dijken, Jan W V

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Dijken, Jan W V
By organisation
Department of Odontology
In the same journal
Dental Materials
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 63 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf