umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development of fluency and revision in L1 and L2 writing in Swedish High School years eight and nine
Umeå University, Umeå School of Education (USE). Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of language studies.
Reading University.
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of language studies.
2008 (English)In: ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 156, 133-151 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this paper we use keystroke logging to examine the development of fluency and revision in high school L1 Swedish and L2 English writing.  Each writer wrote one text in English and one in Swedish in each year of the study. Using a combination of statistical and automatic analyses of the keystroke log, we attempted to investigate: i) how the on-line writing process in terms of revising, pausing and fluency in first and second language writing changes over time, ii) whether there are on-line writing process variables which can be identified as contributing to text improvement, and iii) whether there are any aspects of L1 writing which can be identified as contributing to L2 writing and learning processes and which may form part of a teaching programme. Previous studies of L2 writers have attested to changes in fluency, pause and revision behaviour, and amount of text produced, although associations with the quality of the final output are not clearly supported. The within-writer comparison of this study addresses differences in fluency, pause and revision behaviour between L1 and L2 writing. A regression analysis looking at quality and two types of revision (Form, and Conceptual) found that form revision frequency was related to the language of writing and that conceptual revision frequency was dependent on linguistic experience rather than on language. The findings suggest that conceptual revision and writing skills are transferred from the L1 to the L2, and that these skills should be taught accordingly.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 156, 133-151 p.
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-35383OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-35383DiVA: diva2:343776
Available from: 2010-08-16 Created: 2010-08-16 Last updated: 2014-11-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindgren, EvaSullivan, Kirk P H
By organisation
Umeå School of Education (USE)Department of language studies
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 707 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf