umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Repeated groin hernia recurrences.
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Lund, Lund, Sweden.
CLINTEC, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Annals of Surgery, ISSN 0003-4932, E-ISSN 1528-1140, Vol. 249, no 3, 516-518 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVE: To describe the characteristics of patients undergoing multiple groin hernia repairs and to identify strategies that prevent further recurrence. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although relatively infrequent, recurrent groin hernias where several repairs have previously been undertaken constitutes a major problem in hernia surgery. Low numbers and heterogeneity have made it difficult to perform large prospective studies on this group. METHODS: The study was designed as an observational population-based register study. All repairs for recurrent hernia recorded in the Swedish Hernia Register (SHR) 1992-2006 were identified. Risk for reoperation by number of previous repairs, with adjustment for gender and age, and risk for reoperation by unit responsible for previous repair were determined using Cox proportional hazard analysis. RESULTS: There were 12,104 cases of hernia repaired once, 2 repairs in 4199 cases, 3 repairs in 310 cases, 4 repairs in 32 cases, and 5 repairs in 3 cases. The risk for further reoperation increased with the number of previous repairs (P < 0.001). The hazard ratios for reoperation following open preperitoneal mesh repair and laparoscopic repair decreased; whereas, the hazard ratio for sutured repair increased with the number of previous repairs. The difference between Lichtenstein repair and laparoscopic repair was significant for the first 2 repairs (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic preperitoneal repair provides the best surgical outcome in repeated groin hernia recurrence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins , 2009. Vol. 249, no 3, 516-518 p.
National Category
Surgery
Research subject
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-35763DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318199f21cPubMedID: 19247043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-35763DiVA: diva2:346978
Available from: 2010-09-02 Created: 2010-09-02 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Authority records BETA

Gunnarsson, UlfNilsson, Erik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gunnarsson, UlfNordin, PärNilsson, Erik
By organisation
Surgery
In the same journal
Annals of Surgery
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 50 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf