umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparative study of assesment in school and in work based learning
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.
2010 (English)In: Proceeding of EARLI SIG 14 Learning and Professional Development Conference, München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität , 2010Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In a wide perspective this study deals with the high complexity when assessing students in vocational education, exemplified from Carpenter education in a Swedish Upper Secondary School. The aim was to describe and analyze the view of student assessment among Subject Teachers, Vocational Teachers and Instructors at construction sites. Questions asked were; what procedure does the respective teacher category use when carrying out assessments? What kind of knowledge was valued and what type of criteria did the three categories use when making their assessments. Data was collected in form of deep interviews with three Subject Teachers, three Vocational Teachers and three Instructors. Generally the findings reveal that assessment in vocational education is a very complex task. More specific the findings show that Subject Teachers value specific subject knowledge high while the Instructors prefer more general knowledge. Between those two the Vocational Teacher can be found who has to consider both demands from the school and workplace when making their student assessments. The results also indicate that beside the result from written tests the Subject Teachers take problem solving ability and ambition into account when setting grades. The Vocational Teacher do not value written tests but consider self government, knowledge of the process, quality consciousness, aid facilities and self image as valuable key competences. The Instructors view ambition and self knowledge as most valuable when making their assessments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität , 2010.
Keyword [en]
Vocational education, work based learning, assessment, qualification
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-37171OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-37171DiVA: diva2:358222
Conference
5th EARLI SIG 14 Conference, 25.08. - 27.08.2010.
Available from: 2010-10-21 Created: 2010-10-21 Last updated: 2014-09-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Fjellström, MagnusJohansson, Sigurd

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fjellström, MagnusJohansson, Sigurd
By organisation
Department of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 215 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf