Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Multi-stakeholder collaboration in Russian and Swedish model forest initiatives: adaptive governance toward sustainable forest management?
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Umeå University. (Arcum)
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
2010 (English)In: Ecology & society, ISSN 1708-3087, E-ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 15, no 2, 14Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Building the adaptive capacity of interlinked social and ecological systems is assumed to improve implementation of sustainable forest management (SFM) policies. One mechanism is collaborative learning by continuous evaluation, communication, and transdisciplinary knowledge production. The Model Forest (MF) concept, developed in Canada, is intended to encourage all dimensions of sustainable development through collaboration among stakeholders of forest resources in a geographical area. Because the MF approach encompasses both social and ecological systems, it can be seen as a process aimed at improving adaptive capacity to deal with uncertainty and change. We analyzed multi-stakeholder approaches used in four MF initiatives representing social–ecological systems with different governance legacies and economic histories in the northwest of the Russian Federation (Komi MF and Pskov MF) and in Sweden (Vilhelmina MF and the Foundation Säfsen Forests in the Bergslagen region). To describe the motivations behind development of the initiative and the governance systems, we used qualitative open-ended interviews and analyzed reports and official documents. The initial driving forces for establishing new local governance arrangements were different in all four cases. All MFs were characterized by multi-level and multi-sector collaboration. However, the distribution of power among stakeholders ranged from clearly top down in the Russian Federation to largely bottom up in Sweden. All MF initiatives shared three main challenges: (a) to develop governance arrangements that include representative actors and stakeholders, (b) to combine top-down and bottom-up approaches to governance, and (c) to coordinate different sectors’ modes of landscape governance. We conclude that, in principle, the MF concept is a promising approach to multi-stakeholder collaboration. However, to understand the local and regional dimensions of sustainability, and the level of adaptability of such multi-stakeholder collaboration initiatives, empirical studies of outcomes are needed. To assess the adaptive capacity, the states and trends of economic, ecological, social, and cultural dimensions in actual landscapes need to be linked to how the multi-stakeholder collaboration develops and performs over the long term.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Resilience Alliance Publications , 2010. Vol. 15, no 2, 14
Keyword [en]
boreal forest, landscape, multi-level collaboration, sustainability, sustainable development
National Category
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies) Environmental Sciences Ecology
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-39454ISI: 000279866400009OAI: diva2:392717
Available from: 2011-01-27 Created: 2011-01-27 Last updated: 2016-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links


Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandström, Camilla
By organisation
Umeå University
In the same journal
Ecology & society
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies)Environmental SciencesEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 46 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link