Linking forest history and conservation efforts: effects of logging on forest structure and diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi
2010 (English)In: Biological Conservation, ISSN 0006-3207, E-ISSN 1873-2917, Vol. 143, no 7, 1803-1811 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Throughout the northern hemisphere old forests with high abundance of dead wood are rare features in most landscapes today, and the loss of dead wood constitutes a serious threat to the existence of many species. This study, using field surveys and dendrochronology, examines the relationship between wood-inhabiting fungi and past forest utilisation along a gradient of early logging activity. Data were collected in three late-successional Scots pine forests in northern Sweden. Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling (NMS) was then used to assess differences in species composition among the forests. Our results show that minor forest logging (22–26 cut stumps ha−1) carried out a century ago may have continuing effects on forest characteristics, including dead wood dynamics and the wood-inhabiting fungal community – especially the abundance of red-listed species. The most important effects are lower numbers of logs in early and intermediate stages of decomposition. Additionally, numbers of species (including red-listed species) can be high in forests that have been subject to low levels of logging. Overall, the high species numbers recorded in this study (n = 60–87) show that old, low-productivity pine forests harbour a considerable fraction of the total diversity of Basidiomycetes in northern Fennoscandian boreal forests. We conclude that the formation of a framework linking forest history and environmental data is vital for understanding the ecology and formulating goals for future management of these forests.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 143, no 7, 1803-1811 p.
forest history, wood-inhabiting fungi, logging, conservation, CWD, pinus sylvestris
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences Ecology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-39590DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.04.035ISI: 000279413800024OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-39590DiVA: diva2:394166