Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Association of occupation with prevalent hypertension in an elderly East German population: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9722-0370
Show others and affiliations
2011 (English)In: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, ISSN 0340-0131, E-ISSN 1432-1246, Vol. 84, 361-369 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose   Hypertension is one of the most relevant risk factors for cardiovascular disease; however, little is known about differences in hypertension by occupation. The aim of this study was to explore the association between occupational group and prevalent hypertension.

Methods   Cross-sectional data of the CARLA study were used, a representative sample of an East German population aged 45–83. Job titles of the current or last held occupation of 967 men and 808 women were coded using the German classification of occupation. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure of ≥140 mmHg (systolic), ≥90 mmHg (diastolic) or use of antihypertensives. Sex-stratified, age-adjusted prevalence risk ratios (PR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for 31 occupational groups.

Results   Hypertension was prevalent in 79% of the population. In men, highest age-adjusted prevalence ratios were observed in metal-processing workers, carpenters/painters, and electricians with PRs of 1.31 (CI 1.04–1.65), 1.28 (CI 1.00–1.64), and 1.21 (0.95–1.53), respectively, compared to office clerks. In women, highest PRs were found in technicians/forewomen, scrutinisers/storekeepers, and food-processing occupations with PR 1.28 (1.09–1.49), 1.23 (0.99–1.51), and 1.22 (1.01–1.48), respectively. Adjustment for education, smoking, body mass index, and current work hours did not fully explain occupational differences. Excluding currently non-working subjects lead to decreased PRs in men and to increased PR in women.

Conclusions   Differences in the prevalences of hypertension by occupational group were only partly explained by conventional risk factors and may require workplace interventions targeted at high-risk occupations. Longitudinal data with large cohorts and work-related exposure assessment are needed to confirm a temporal relationship between occupation and incident hypertension.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. Vol. 84, 361-369 p.
Keyword [en]
Occupational groups, Hypertension, Cardiovascular risk factors
National Category
Environmental Health and Occupational Health
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-40707DOI: 10.1007/s00420-010-0584-5OAI: diva2:402177
Available from: 2011-03-07 Created: 2011-03-07 Last updated: 2015-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schumann, Barbara
By organisation
Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
Environmental Health and Occupational Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 65 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link