Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Evaluation of the identification power of RPLC analyses in the screening for drug compounds
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Analytical Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Technology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.
Department of Chemistry, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
2010 (English)In: Analytical Chemistry, ISSN 0003-2700, E-ISSN 1520-6882, Vol. 82, no 14, 6056-65 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The identification of drugs of abuse is an important issue in forensic science. The main goal is to trace and identify as many drugs as possible in the shortest possible time preferably with a simple analysis method. One possibility is to screen samples using a Liquid Chromatography-Diode Array Detection (LC-DAD) system. However, when simultaneously performing another analysis on a chromatographic column exhibiting selectivity differences from the first one, that is, orthogonal or dissimilar columns, a greater number of drugs can be possibly identified without investing a lot of extra time or money. The primary difficulty is then selecting the most appropriate columns. In this paper, it is demonstrated that selecting the most dissimilar columns based on measures such as correlation or Snyder's F(s) value is not optimal, because these measures do not take into account the identification power of the individual systems. This implies that a large number of drugs may not necessarily be identified on the systems selected using these criteria. Therefore, three other measures are tested to evaluate the identification power obtained by parallel screening on two columns or by comprehensive two-dimensional LC (LC x LC). The simplest approach is counting the number of compounds separable with a difference in retention time greater than a predefined critical value. However, this measure does not reflect the coelution pattern of the unidentified drugs nor the separation degree of all compounds. The second tested measure, information, enables differentiation between systems identifying the same number of compounds but resulting in a different coelution pattern. Multivariate selectivity, the third tested parameter, takes into account the degree of separation of all compounds and has the advantage that it reflects the gain in identification power achieved by introducing DAD data. All three proposed measures also enable evaluation of whether the corresponding LC x LC method will result in a greater identification power.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 82, no 14, 6056-65 p.
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-45393DOI: 10.1021/ac1006415PubMedID: 20578680OAI: diva2:429364
Available from: 2011-07-04 Created: 2011-07-04 Last updated: 2011-09-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dumarey, Melanie
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 50 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link