Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
The impacts of selective logging on non-timber forest products of livelihood importance
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
Woods and Wayside International, Princeton, NJ, USA. (Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia)
Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, Kibale, Uganda. (Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia)
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Forest Ecology and Management, ISSN 0378-1127, Vol. 268, 57-69 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The potential for combining timber and non-timber forest product extraction has been examined in the context of diversified forest management. Many tropical forests are exploited both commercially for timber and by forest-dependent communities for non-timber forest products (NTFPs). Divergences between these two uses may have significant implications for forest-dependent livelihoods. This article gathers existing examples of conflicts and complementarities between selective logging and non-timber uses of forest from the livelihood perspective. Additionally it draws on three case studies from Brazil, Cameroon and Indonesia to examine by what mechanisms, and to what extent, logging impacts forest resources of livelihood importance, as well as to consider how factors such as logging regime and forest management system may mediate such influences. By doing so we aim to shed further light on a relatively unacknowledged issue in tropical forest management and conservation.

Four specific mechanisms were identified; conflict of use and the indirect impacts of logging being those most commonly implicated in negative effects on livelihood-relevant NTFPs. Eighty two percent of reviewed articles highlighted negative impacts on NTFP availability. Examples of positive impacts were restricted to light demanding species that respond to the opening of forest structure and typically represent a small subset of those of livelihood value. Despite considerable impacts on livelihoods, in all three case studies we found evidence to support the potential for enhanced compatibility between timber extraction and the subsistence use of NTFPs. Drawing on this evidence, and findings from our review, we make specific recommendations for research, policy and management implementation. These findings have significant implications for reconciling timber and non-timber uses of tropical forests.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2012. Vol. 268, 57-69 p.
Keyword [en]
Livelihood, Multiple-use, NTFP, Reduced impact logging, Sustainable forest management, Timber
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-45766DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.037OAI: diva2:434894
Available online 26 May 2011.Available from: 2011-08-16 Created: 2011-08-16 Last updated: 2012-08-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rist, Lucy
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Forest Ecology and Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 127 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link