umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
MR based workflow for external radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.
2009 (English)In: IFMBE Proceedings 25/1 / [ed] O Dössel, W C Schegel, R Magjarevic, Springer Verlag , 2009, 60-63 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

The requirements on spatial accuracy are high in external radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The technical achievements in image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) during the recent years have lead to a significant improvement of the daily positioning accuracy. Improved accuracy has made it possible to reduce the margin between the clinical target volume and the planning target volume, thus reduce the risk for normal tissue complications. MRI is to prefer to CT for delineation of the prostate target because of superior soft tissue contrast. Recent studies have shown that the dosimetric accuracy of dose calculations on MR material is acceptable. In the present work we analyze the spatial uncertainties that are connected to workflows where the CT has been excluded. We found that accuracy increase with a fully MR based workflow. The main reason is that the MR based workflow does not require any registration between MR and CT to enable target delineation on the MR series. Two different methodologies for patient positioning with MR as baseline were identified: A. Implanted fiducial markers with portal imaging at each treatment session. B. Imaging of the patient in the MR at every treatment session to localize the prostate. We found that the two positioning methods give equivalent spatial accuracy. The estimated required margins for the MR based workflows was around 8 mm, corresponding numbers for a CT based workflow using the same assessment methods was around 10 mm.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Verlag , 2009. 60-63 p.
Keyword [en]
External radiotherapy, Prostate, Margins, MRI, fiducial markers
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-46175DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03474-9_16ISBN: 978-3-642-03472-5 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-46175DiVA: diva2:437268
Available from: 2011-08-29 Created: 2011-08-29 Last updated: 2011-08-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Nyholm, TufveKarlsson, Magnus GKarlsson, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nyholm, TufveKarlsson, Magnus GKarlsson, Mikael
By organisation
Radiation Physics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 95 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf