Residual compromised myocardial contractile reserve after valve replacement for aortic stenosis
2012 (English)In: European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, ISSN 2047-2404, Vol. 13, no 4, 353-360 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Objective: Despite recovery of left ventricular (LV) function and morphology after aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS), its relationship with exercise capacity remains unknown. Twenty-one AVR patients (age 61 +/- 12 years, 14 male) with normal ejection fraction (EF, 64 +/- 7%) and 21 age- and sex-matched controls (57 +/- 9 years, 10 male, EF 68 +/- 8%) were studied.Methods and results: All subjects performed semi-supine bicycle exercise and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) study. Peak oxygen consumption (pVO(2)) was collected during semi-supine bicycle exercise. Systolic (GLSRs) and early diastolic (GLSRe) longitudinal strain rate using STE and Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured at rest, submaximal, peak exercise, and 4 min after exercise. The two groups had comparable resting echocardiographic measurements. At peak exercise, pVO(2) was lower in patients than controls (18.5 +/- 4.5 vs. 22.1 +/- 4.3 L/min/kg, P < 0.05). GLSRs (0.98 +/- 0.28 vs. 1.55 +/- 0.30 1/s, P < 0.001), septal Sm (7.9 +/- 1.4 vs. 11.1 +/- 2.3 cm/s, P < 0.001) and their changes between rest and peak exercise (Delta GLSRs: 0.16 +/- 0.33 vs. 0.68 +/- 0.27 1/s, P < 0.001; Delta Sm 2.29 +/- 2.23 vs. 4.63 +/- 2.29 cm/s, P < 0.01) were significantly lower in patients than controls. There was no correlation between pVO(2) and any echocardiographic measurements in controls. In patients, pVO(2) correlated with peak exercise GLSRs (r = 0.60, P = 0.0007), septal Sm (r = 0.65, P = 0.002), and Em (r = 0.57, P = 0.009). In a multivariate model, peak exercise GLSRs (beta = 7.18, P = 0.03) was the only independent predictor of pVO(2) in the patients group.Conclusion: Exercise capacity is subnormal after AVR for AS, irrespective of normal LVEF suggesting residual compromised myocardial functional reserve.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Vol. 13, no 4, 353-360 p.
Exercise echocardiography, Aortic valve replacement, Strain rate, Reserve
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-47565DOI: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer246ISI: 000303227200013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-47565DiVA: diva2:443002