umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Budget communication moderate incongruent budget emphasis between the superior and subordinate
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE).
1998 (English)In: The Finnish Journal of Business Economics, ISSN 0024-3469, no 1, 11-23 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Subsequent research on the moderating impact of budgetary participation on superior budget emphasis to promote functional budget behaviour has either provided inconsistent (Brownell, 1982; Hirst, 1987 and Dunk, 1989; Hassel, 1993) or situation specific (Brownell and Hirst, 1986; Brownell and Dunk 1991) results.

This study follows the early argument by Otley (1978) that critical for promoting functional budget control is not so much the absolute degree of superior budget emphasis. Instead, incongruent budget emphasis between the superior and the subordinate is the critical factor in the budget process. Incongruent budget emphasis exists when the superior is perceived by the subordinate to place relatively more importance on the budget, than the subordinate himself.

The results from a questionnaire survey in a decentralised corporation support the hypothesis that budget communication, as a dimension of budgetary participation, moderates incongruent budget emphasis. The negative consequences of incongruent budget emphasis are present only when budget communication is low. High budget communication enhances performance even if the incongruence in budget emphasis increases. The paper demonstrates the needs to match budget communication with relative budget emphasis and not the absolute degree of superior budget emphasis as previous studies have argued.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Association for Business Studies Administration, Finland , 1998. no 1, 11-23 p.
National Category
Business Administration
Research subject
Business Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-50222OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-50222DiVA: diva2:460549
Available from: 2011-11-30 Created: 2011-11-30 Last updated: 2012-08-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hassel, Lars
By organisation
Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE)
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 58 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf