umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity of electrical stimulus magnitude matching in chronic pain
Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims (RCT), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine.
Rehabilitation and Research Centre for Torture Victims (RCT), Copenhagen, Denmark. (University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark)
2009 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 41, no 11, 898-903 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To examine the validity of the PainMatcher in chronic pain.

Design: Comparison of parallel pain estimates from visual analogue scales with electrical stimulus magnitude matching.

Patients: Thirty-one patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: Twice a day ongoing pain was rated on a standard 100-mm visual analogue scale, and thereafter magnitude matching was performed using a PainMatcher. The sensory threshold to electrical stimulation was tested twice on separate occasions.

Results: In 438 observations visual analogue scale ranged from 3 to 95 (median 41) mm, and PainMatcher magnitudes from 2.67 to 27.67 (median 6.67; mean 7.78) steps. There was little correlation between visual analogue scale and magnitude data (r = 0.29; p < 0.0001). The mean sensory threshold was 3.67 steps, indicating that the PainMatcher, on average, stimulated at 2.1 times the perception threshold at matching point.

Conclusion: Electrical magnitude matching of chronic pain intensity elicited limited activation of nerve fibres at 2.0–2.2 times sensory threshold, indicating that the induced pain was evoked by coarse nociceptive Aδ fibres. While the visual analogue scale estimates covered the whole range of the instrument, the PainMatcher readings utilized only a small part of the instrument range and, importantly, had little or no relation to the visual analogue scale estimates. The validity of the PainMatcher procedure is doubtful.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. Vol. 41, no 11, 898-903 p.
Keyword [en]
electric stimulation, pain measurement, sensory threshold, visual analogue scale, reproducibility of results
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Research subject
Rehabilitation Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-50390PubMedID: 19841841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-50390DiVA: diva2:462956
Available from: 2011-12-08 Created: 2011-12-07 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

PubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Westermark, SofiaMerrick, Daniel
By organisation
Rehabilitation Medicine
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 46 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf