umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Probabilistic methods for verbal autopsy interpretation: InterVA robustness in relation to variations in a priori probabilities
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5474-4361
2011 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 6, no 11, e27200- p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: InterVA is a probabilistic method for interpreting verbal autopsy (VA) data. It uses a priori approximations of probabilities relating to diseases and symptoms to calculate the probability of specific causes of death given reported symptoms recorded in a VA interview. The extent to which InterVA's ability to characterise a population's mortality composition might be sensitive to variations in these a priori probabilities was investigated.

Methods: A priori InterVA probabilities were changed by 1, 2 or 3 steps on the logarithmic scale on which the original probabilities were based. These changes were made to a random selection of 25% and 50% of the original probabilities, giving six model variants. A random sample of 1,000 VAs from South Africa, were used as a basis for experimentation and were processed using the original InterVA model and 20 random instances of each of the six InterVA model variants. Rank order of cause of death and cause-specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) from the original InterVA model and the mean, maximum and minimum results from the 20 randomly modified InterVA models for each of the six variants were compared.

Results: CSMFs were functionally similar between the original InterVA model and the models with modified a priori probabilities such that even the CSMFs based on the InterVA model with the greatest degree of variation in the a priori probabilities would not lead to substantially different public health conclusions. The rank order of causes were also similar between all versions of InterVA.

Conclusion: InterVA is a robust model for interpreting VA data and even relatively large variations in a priori probabilities do not affect InterVA-derived results to a great degree. The original physician-derived a priori probabilities are likely to be sufficient for the global application of InterVA in settings without routine death certification.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science , 2011. Vol. 6, no 11, e27200- p.
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-50693DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027200ISI: 000297197000031OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-50693DiVA: diva2:468153
Funder
FAS, Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, 2006-1512Wellcome trust, 058893/Z/99/A, 069683/Z/02/Z and 085477/Z/08/Z)
Note

Funder/forskningsfinansiär: University of the Witwatersrand and Medical Research Council, South Africa

Available from: 2011-12-20 Created: 2011-12-19 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Probabilistic methods for verbal autopsy interpretation: InterVA robustness in relation to variations in a priori probabilities(888 kB)90 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 888 kBChecksum SHA-512
b9dc11196d126269ca7cf5d0f82db62f3b7820d0ddea2164b7bc5de3ca47c585eb4c2bcc30cba50ba9e4dcd67328f93ba84c6790b10942d61a77b605c442ca8d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fottrell, EdwardKahn, KathleenTollman, StephenByass, Peter
By organisation
Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 90 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf