umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emotions matter after all: how reproductive rights advocates orchestrate emotions to influence policies in Peru
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1975-9060
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology.
2011 (English)In: Sociological perspectives, ISSN 0731-1214, E-ISSN 1533-8673, Vol. 54, no 4, 665-688 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Emotions clearly matter in social movements, but it is less apparent how social movement participants actively handle emotions in their line of activities. In this article, the authors address this question by examining how two reproductive rights coalitions in Peru employ and manage emotions in relation to different actors who they must deal with to influence policies. Empirical materials consist of participant observation, focus groups, and individual interviews conducted with the coalitions and their members. Grounded theory was used to analyze the data. The authors distinguish relationships with five relevant actors: the internal members of the coalitions, allies, the general public, the Catholic Church as the major opponent, and government officials as the main target. As each relationship requires distinct emotion work, coalition members simultaneously adjust to contradictory emotional expectations while actively evoking and coordinating emotions. The authors refer to this as the orchestration of emotion work.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of California Press, 2011. Vol. 54, no 4, 665-688 p.
Keyword [en]
emotion work, social movements, feminism, advocacy, reproductive rights, Peru
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-50623DOI: 10.1525/sop.2011.54.4.665ISI: 000304048500009OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-50623DiVA: diva2:474069
Available from: 2012-01-09 Created: 2011-12-15 Last updated: 2017-12-08Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. How social movements influence policies: Advocacy, framing, emotions and outcomes among reproductive rights coalitions in Peru.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>How social movements influence policies: Advocacy, framing, emotions and outcomes among reproductive rights coalitions in Peru.
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

With its origins in the early 1990s, feminist advocacy directed at influencing public policies is a relatively new phenomenon in Latin America that is commonly studied at the national level. The aim of this thesis was to study feminist advocacy on reproductive rights at the sub-national level in Peru. Specifically, it explored two research questions: how do feminist movements carry out advocacy to intervene with government agencies and what effects does their advocacy have on policies. This aim ties in with the body of literature that seeks to explain how and what outcomes are produced by social movements. Grounded Theory was used to collect and analyze empirical materials on two reproductive rights coalitions and their members in Arequipa and Cusco, Peru. Empirical materials consisted of focus group discussions, individual interviews and participant observation. Data analysis resulted in two core categories: Coalition-Government Interactions and Policy Outcomes. Linked to the core categories are thirteen categories, which constitute factors that the reproductive rights coalitions “deal with” or “strategize about” in order to interact with government officials and attain policy outcomes. The coalitions maneuver those factors they have immediate control over - tactics, organization, framing and emotions - as a means to deal with those factors they do not have immediate control over - relationships with other policy actors as well as political, cultural and social contexts. The findings help refine existing theories on how and what outcomes are attained by social movements. The coalitions and their members influence policies through various channels by developing an array of interactions with government officials. This allows the coalitions to handle potential constraints on their ability to be a critical voice. Political, cultural and social contexts are not the only external factors affecting the coalitions’ influence on policies. Another key external factor is their relationships with other policy actors comprised of a range of organized political and social groups. Concerning internal factors, the coalitions and their members rely on framing activities and emotion work in addition to organization and tactics. Indeed, the coalitions and their members engage in framing activities and emotion work by means of their relationships with other policy actors to influence policies. Finally, the coalitions perceive effects of their advocacy including, but not limited to, the modification of laws and policies. Instead, outcomes were identified along different stages of the policy process, including the impact of coalition frames on policy positions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Sociologiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, 2010. 91 p.
Series
Akademiska avhandlingar vid Sociologiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, ISSN 1104-2508 ; 62
Keyword
Advocacy, emotions, framing, outcomes, Peru, policies, reproductive rights, social movements
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-33483 (URN)978-91-7264-990-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-21, Norra Beteendevetarhuset HS1031, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-04-30 Created: 2010-04-26 Last updated: 2015-03-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Coe, Anna-BrittSchnabel, Annette
By organisation
Umeå Centre for Gender Studies (UCGS)Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Sociological perspectives
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf