Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
On the forest cover-water yield debate: from demand- to supply-side thinking
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Geography and Economic History.
2012 (English)In: Global Change Biology, ISSN 1354-1013, E-ISSN 1365-2486, Vol. 18, no 3, 806-820 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Several major articles from the past decade and beyond conclude the impact of reforestation or afforestation on water yield is negative: additional forest cover will reduce and removing forests will raise downstream water availability. A second group of authors argue the opposite: planting additional forests should raise downstream water availability and intensify the hydrologic cycle. Obtaining supporting evidence for this second group of authors has been more difficult due to the larger scales at which the positive effects of forests on the water cycle may be seen. We argue that forest cover is inextricably linked to precipitation. Forest-driven evapotranspiration removed from a particular catchment contributes to the availability of atmospheric moisture vapor and its cross-continental transport, raising the likelihood of precipitation events and increasing water yield, in particular in continental interiors more distant from oceans. Seasonal relationships heighten the importance of this phenomenon. We review the arguments from different scales and perspectives. This clarifies the generally beneficial relationship between forest cover and the intensity of the hydrologic cycle. While evidence supports both sides of the argument trees can reduce runoff at the small catchment scale at larger scales, trees are more clearly linked to increased precipitation and water availability. Progressive deforestation, land conversion from forest to agriculture and urbanization have potentially negative consequences for global precipitation, prompting us to think of forest ecosystems as global public goods. Policy-making attempts to measure product water footprints, estimate the value of ecosystem services, promote afforestation, develop drought mitigation strategies and otherwise manage land use must consider the linkage of forests to the supply of precipitation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 18, no 3, 806-820 p.
Keyword [en]
afforestation, climate change adaptation, forest ecosystem services, precipitation recycling, water yield
National Category
Social and Economic Geography
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-55387DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02589.xISI: 000300671600002OAI: diva2:529159
Available from: 2012-05-29 Created: 2012-05-14 Last updated: 2012-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ellison, David
By organisation
Department of Geography and Economic History
In the same journal
Global Change Biology
Social and Economic Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 41 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link