umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Change in intraocular pressure measurement 2 years after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2055-576X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Ophthalmology.
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, ISSN 0886-3350, E-ISSN 1873-4502, Vol. 38, no 9, 1637-1642 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: To evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements 24 months after laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) with 3 tonometry methods-Goldmann applanation tonometry (DCT), Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), and applanation resonance tonometry (ART)-and to compare them with measurements taken preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Umea University, lima Sweden. DESIGN: Prospective randomized single-center. METHODS: One randomized eye per person from myopic healthy individuals who had LASEK was included. Visual acuity, central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, and IOP were measured at all time points. Six IOP measurements were performed per method, with a 5-minute lapse between methods. RESULTS: The study evaluated 38 eyes. Two years after LASEK, dynamic ART was the only method that did not measure significantly lower IOP than before LASEK (mean -0.2 mm Hg +/- 1.6 [SD]). The greatest difference was with GAT (mean -1.9 +/- 1.7 mm Hg) followed by static ART (mean -1.2 +/- 1.6 mm Hg) and then DCT (mean -0.9 +/- 1.3 mm Hg). All methods measured significantly lower IOP at 3 months and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic ART, which analyses IOP measurement during indentation, showed no significant difference in measured IOP after 24 months. The convex tip of the ART device and the continuous sampling of data during corneal indentation seem to be factors in why dynamic ART was less affected by corneal properties and therefore more suitable for IOP measurement in LASEK-treated eyes, although this must be confirmed in larger trials.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 38, no 9, 1637-1642 p.
National Category
Ophthalmology Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-60651DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.033ISI: 000308731200019OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-60651DiVA: diva2:562900
Conference
Annual Meeting of the Swedish-Ophthalmological-Society, AUG, 2011, Linkoping, SWEDEN
Available from: 2012-10-26 Created: 2012-10-22 Last updated: 2017-12-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johannesson, GautiHallberg, PerEklund, AndersKoskela, TimoLinden, Christina
By organisation
OphthalmologyRadiation Physics
In the same journal
Journal of cataract and refractive surgery
OphthalmologySurgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 130 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf