Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Current routines for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: A web-based survey by the Swedish Urology Network
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology.
2012 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology, ISSN 0036-5599, E-ISSN 1651-2065, Vol. 46, no 6, 405-410 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective. This study aimed to survey current Swedish practices for performing and handling transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. Material and methods. A Swedish Urology Network (SUNe) was organized for the distribution of information, survey studies and research collaborations. A web-based questionnaire was distributed to the members in 2011. Results. In this first SUNe survey, 137 (91%) of the 151 members replied. All used antibiotic prophylaxis (84% ciprofloxacin, 12% trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), most commonly (63%) as a single dose of ciprofloxacin. Local anaesthesia was used by 87%. Half of the respondents only used a "side-fire" probe, whereas 17% always used an "end-fire" probe. Most (84%) routinely took 10 or more biopsy cores. About three-quarters started with the right base of the prostate and did not routinely take midline biopsies. More than one-third never or rarely sampled the anterior part of the prostate. There was great variability in how biopsy location was reported, but 71% considered a national standardized coordinate system desirable. Fine-needle aspiration was used occasionally by 39%, in more than 10% of cases by 6% and always by 2%. Most urologists mounted the biopsy cores on paper before fixation (78%), put only one core per jar (75%) and used flat-bottomed jars (70%). Conclusions. Most routines for handling of prostate biopsies, antibiotic prophylaxis, local anaesthesia and number of cores were uniform. However, there is still a need for standardization of the performance of ultrasound-guided biopsies. Although the method used to specify biopsy location varied greatly, most urologists would prefer a national standardized system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 46, no 6, 405-410 p.
Keyword [en]
pathology, prostate cancer, transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy
National Category
Urology and Nephrology
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-63023DOI: 10.3109/00365599.2012.691111ISI: 000311837800003OAI: diva2:581126
Available from: 2012-12-28 Created: 2012-12-27 Last updated: 2013-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stattin, Pär
By organisation
Urology and Andrology
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology
Urology and Nephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link