umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Skriva för intrigen?: några tankar om forskaren som författare
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of culture and media studies.
2012 (Swedish)In: Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap, ISSN 1104-0556, E-ISSN 2001-094X, Vol. 42, no 4, 27-38 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Writing for the plot? Some thoughts on academics as writers

 

In one of her books, bell hooks concludes: ”All academics write, but not all see themselves as writers.” This paradoxical dilemma is the starting point for this article, which wants to explore and challenge the notion of academic writing and knowledge production as rational, ungendered and disembodied intellectual activity. Against the backdrop of neoliberal research policies, with its accelerating demands for marketable and measurable results, it is perhaps more import than ever to claim, with Martha C. Nussbaums words, ”faculties of thought and imagination” as a crucial but non-measurable core of humanistic education and research.

   It is argued in the article that the very naming of the practices and skills required for scholarly work affects our understanding of them in terms of professional competence and scientific authority. Furthermore, these normative thought patterns on what academic writing is; who performs it and how it is done often also reveals a hierarchized dichotomy between scientific and literary writing. What would happen if scholars in literary studies instead would ask themselves not only how, for instance, poetry can be theorized, but also how theory can be poetizised? Would it possible for the scholar to adopt narrative techniques such as travesty, metaphors and plot? Is it, in short, possible to not only read but also write for the plot? Thus, trying to locate the “in-betweens” and margins between genres as a possible site of dialogue, the article promotes a plea for a genre-transgressive, embodied and emotional view on the methodologies and epistemologies of academic writing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lund: Föreningen för utgivandet av Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap , 2012. Vol. 42, no 4, 27-38 p.
Keyword [en]
creative academic writing, emotions, feminist theory, excellens, new-utilitarism
Keyword [sv]
kreativt akademiskt skrivande, emotioner, feministisk teori, excellens, ny-utilitarism
National Category
Humanities
Research subject
Literature
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-63994OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-63994DiVA: diva2:585804
Available from: 2013-01-10 Created: 2013-01-10 Last updated: 2017-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Länk till fulltexten på tidskriftens webbplats

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bränström Öhman, Annelie
By organisation
Department of culture and media studies
In the same journal
Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 91 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf