umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Impacts of policy measures on the development of state-owned forests in Northeast China: Theoretical results and empirical evidence
School of Economics and Management, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing. (College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China)
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics, Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing, China.
2011 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

State-owned forest enterprises (SOFEs) in northeast China and Inner Mongolia play important roles both in timber production and in the maintenance of ecological security. However, since the late 1970s, forest resource and economic crises have seriously restricted these functions. Based on a theoretical and an empirical analysis of the harvest and investment behavior of the SOFEs, we examined the effects of forest policies and the socioeconomic conditions on the behavioral choices of the SOFEs. Both the extent to which SOFE supervising authorities emphasized improvement of forest resources in their annual evaluations and the increases in expenses necessary to manage SOFEs had significant impacts on harvest and investment decisions as well as development of forest resources. Promoting the management and utilization of non-timber resources, as well as reforms to increase the efficiency of forest protection and management, have reduced timber harvests as intended, which in turn has increased investment and improved forest resources. The effects have been relatively small, however. In contrast, reforms aimed at timber harvest and afforestation activities actually contributed toincreasing the timber harvest, which affected the development of the forest resources negatively.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Environment for Development & Resources For the Future , 2011. , 28 p.
Series
Environment for Development, Discussion Paper, 11-12
Keyword [en]
state-owned forest enterprise, "double crises, " sustainable forest management, forest policy
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-64427OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-64427DiVA: diva2:601195
Available from: 2013-01-28 Created: 2013-01-28 Last updated: 2013-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bostedt, Göran
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 65 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf