umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is stump harvesting a remedy for the climate crisis or a curse for biodiversity?: An interdisciplinary study of conflicting goals
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics and Dept of Forest Economics Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Dept. of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden .
Centre for Environmental and Resource Economics and Dept of Forest Economics Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Center for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE).
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Dead wood is recognized as being one of the most important factors for forest biodiversity for many organism groups. One of the Swedish official environmental objectives is therefore to increase dead wood volume. However, reducing climate impact through increased use of forest biofuels is likely to work against this objective. The analysis is based on a regional economic forest sector model, focusing on northern Sweden, that includes suppliers and major users of roundwood and ecological results of stump harvest on forest biodiversity.

The parameters of the model are estimated with a data set spanning 28 years. We simulate the effects of an increased demand for wood fuels in northern Sweden, with or without stump harvest. The two scenarios have different effects on all major roundwood markets in the region, as well as on biodiversity. More specifically, in our model, the scenario with stump harvest implies a 0.3 percent decrease in the emissions of greenhouse gases and a 4.12 percent reduction in overall population density of saproxylic beetles on each years future clear cuts. Thus, a clear goal conflict exists.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: CERE , 2012. , 30 p.
Series
CERE Working Paper, 2012:5
National Category
Economics
Research subject
Economics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-64462OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-64462DiVA: diva2:601382
Available from: 2013-01-29 Created: 2013-01-29 Last updated: 2013-02-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

fulltext

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bostedt, GöranBrännlund, Runar
By organisation
Center for Environmental and Resource Economics (CERE)
Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 74 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf