Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Conspicuous Leisure: Optimal Income Taxation When Both Relative Consumption and Relative Leisure Matter
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Economics.
University of Gothenburg, SE-405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Economics, ISSN 0347-0520, E-ISSN 1467-9442, Vol. 115, no 1, 155-175 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In previous studies on public policy under relative-consumption concerns, leisure comparisons have been ignored. In this paper, we consider a two-type optimal non-linear income tax model, in which people care about both their relative consumption and their relative leisure. Increased consumption positionality typically implies higher marginal income tax rates for both ability types, whereas leisure positionality has an offsetting role. However, this offsetting role is not symmetric; concern about relative leisure implies a progressive income tax component (i.e., a component that is larger for the high-ability type than for the low-ability type). Leisure positionality does not modify the policy rule for public-good provision.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2013. Vol. 115, no 1, 155-175 p.
National Category
Research subject
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-64780DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2012.01738.xOAI: diva2:602708
Available from: 2013-02-02 Created: 2013-02-02 Last updated: 2013-06-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Aronsson, Thomas
By organisation
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Economics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 68 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link