umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychological phenomena and first-person perspectives: critical discussions of some arguments in philosophy of mind
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Philosophy and Linguistics.
1999 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The topic of this thesis is how different phenomena, commonly regarded as "psychological" or "mental", are or can be apprehended in the first person. The aim is to show that a number of influential texts of contemporary philosophy display a particular type of oversight on this topic. The texts in question display, I argue, an insufficient appreciation of the case for holding that "non-qualitative" psychological phenomena are apprehended in an exclusive way in the first person.

To make this case, I begin by isolating a limited class of phenomena. The class, which is called the class of 'occurrent psychological doings', includes performances such as searching for a flower and adding two numbers. In chapter 2, I submit a case for holding that it is logically necessary that if an agent is performing an occurrent psychological doing, then he has a certain apprehension of what he is doing. This claim is called The First-Person Thesis'.

In chapter 3, I submit a case for holding that the type of apprehension mentioned in The First-Person Thesis is logically exclusive: it is an apprehension which an agent who is doing so-and-so can have of the fact that he is doing so-and-so but which it is logically impossible for someone else to have of this fact. This claim is called 'The Exclusiveness Thesis'.

In chapters 4 and 5, the two theses are used in critical discussions of some influential texts of contemporary philosophy. In chapter 4,1 examine two arguments of Wittgenstein's to the effect that one may perform some selected actions without having a particular type of "experience", or "sensation". I try to show that these arguments, while valid, have rather limited implications. I use The First-Person Thesis to illustrate the limited scope of these implications. I then try to show that the limited significance of the arguments has often been obscured by commentators of Wittgenstein.

In chapter 5, I examine a position commonly held in contemporary philosophy of mind, and often associated with Nagel. The position is that "qualitative" phenomena such as perceptual experiences and bodily sensations are, because of the appearances they present in the first person, particularly difficult to explain in physical terms. An implication of this view is the claim that other phenomena do not present appearances to subjects in the allegedly problematic way that "qualitative" phenomena do. The First-Person Thesis and The Exclusiveness Thesis are used to argue that this position, as exemplified in the writings of McGinn and Chalmers, involve controversial assumptions for which insufficient justification is provided.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå :: Umeå universitet , 1999. , 203 p.
Series
Umeå studies in the humanities, ISSN 0345-0155 ; 147
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-66616ISBN: 91-7191-604-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-66616DiVA: diva2:608913
Public defence
1999-05-07, Humanisthuset, hörsal F, Umeå universitet, Umeå, 13:15
Projects
digitalisering@umu
Available from: 2013-03-01 Created: 2013-02-26 Last updated: 2013-03-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Psychological Phenomena and First-Person Perspectives(8399 kB)444 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 8399 kBChecksum SHA-512
89228a1c0ed89e19ebda954278d35d83564517d6191f04366ade89f72a92a5c2f69d8173eb5f077238b3048c4ee05a984a187c9fd738936ef4942d2e09a51bda
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Sundström, Pär

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sundström, Pär
By organisation
Philosophy and Linguistics
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 444 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 600 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf