Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Damned if you do, dammed if you don’t: debates on dam removal in the Swedish media
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
2013 (English)In: Ecology and Society, ISSN 1708-3087, Vol. 18, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Dam removal is an increasingly common practice. Dams are removed for various reasons with safety, economics, and ecosystem restoration being the most common. However, dam removals often cause controversy. Riparian land owners and local communities often have a negative view on removal and the reasons why vary. It may be loss of recreational benefits like swimming and boating, loss of cultural and historical context tied to the dam, or fear that removal may have a negative effect on aesthetic values. Since controversies are often picked up by local media, and media in itself is an important channel to build support around a cause, the way dam removals are reported and discussed is likely to influence the debate. In this article, we examine the ways in which proponents and opponents of dam removal frame the services provided by two contrasting ecosystems—an existing dam and the potential stream without a dam—by performing a discourse analysis of the reasons given for removal and the reasons presented for the dam to remain in place. Our source material includes web-based newspaper articles and public comments on those articles in four dam removal controversies in Sweden. Our results indicate that public opposition is not based on knowledge-deficiency where more information will lead to better ecological decision-making, as is sometimes argued in dam removal science; it is instead a case of different understandings and valuation of the environment and the functions it provides.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Resilience Alliance , 2013. Vol. 18, no 1
Keyword [en]
controversies, dam removal, discourse analysis, ecosystem services, newspaper media, Sweden
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-67527DOI: 10.5751/ES-05364-180118OAI: diva2:612586
Available from: 2013-03-22 Created: 2013-03-22 Last updated: 2014-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jørgensen, DollyRenöfält, Brigitta
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 139 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link